These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26773787)

  • 1. Sparse deconvolution method for ultrasound images based on automatic estimation of reference signals.
    Jin H; Yang K; Wu S; Wu H; Chen J
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Apr; 67():1-8. PubMed ID: 26773787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semi-sparse deconvolution robust to uncertainties in the impulse responses.
    Olofsson T
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):969-75. PubMed ID: 15047415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A blind deconvolution method for attenuative materials based on asymmetrical Gaussian model.
    Jin H; Chen J; Yang K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):1184. PubMed ID: 27586747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sparse deconvolution of B-scan images.
    Olofsson T; Wennerström E
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Aug; 54(8):1634-41. PubMed ID: 17703667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sparsity enhancement for blind deconvolution of ultrasonic signals in nondestructive testing application.
    Wei L; Hua-ming L; Pei-wen Q
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2008 Jan; 79(1):014901. PubMed ID: 18248057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sparse Blind Deconvolution with Nonconvex Optimization for Ultrasonic NDT Application.
    Gao X; Shi Y; Du K; Zhu Q; Zhang W
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(23):. PubMed ID: 33291739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhancing ultrasonic time-of-flight diffraction measurement through an adaptive deconvolution method.
    Chen J; Wu E; Wu H; Zhou H; Yang K
    Ultrasonics; 2019 Jul; 96():175-180. PubMed ID: 30745026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A fully automatic reference deconvolution strategy to increase the accuracy of in vivo lipid signal quantification.
    Mauch L; Steidle G; Machann J; Yang B; Schick F
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Apr; 75(4):1391-401. PubMed ID: 25980777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A blind deconvolution approach to ultrasound imaging.
    Yu C; Zhang C; Xie L
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Feb; 59(2):271-80. PubMed ID: 24626035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cluster-enhanced sparse approximation of overlapping ultrasonic echoes.
    Mor E; Aladjem M; Azoulay A
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Feb; 62(2):373-86. PubMed ID: 25643086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deconvolution of sparse underwater acoustic multipath channel with a large time-delay spread.
    Zeng WJ; Jiang X; Li XL; Zhang XD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):909-19. PubMed ID: 20136214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum a posteriori deconvolution of sparse ultrasonic signals using genetic optimization.
    Olofsson T; Stepinski T
    Ultrasonics; 1999 Sep; 37(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 10579031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A sparse reconstruction algorithm for ultrasonic images in nondestructive testing.
    Guarneri GA; Pipa DR; Neves Junior F; de Arruda LV; Zibetti MV
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Apr; 15(4):9324-43. PubMed ID: 25905700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High-definition mapping of neural activity using voltage-sensitive dyes.
    Cinelli AR
    Methods; 2000 Aug; 21(4):349-72. PubMed ID: 10964579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increasing Axial Resolution of Ultrasonic Imaging With a Joint Sparse Representation Model.
    Duan J; Zhong H; Jing B; Zhang S; Wan M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Dec; 63(12):2045-2056. PubMed ID: 27913325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial resolution improvement and dose reduction potential for inner ear CT imaging using a z-axis deconvolution technique.
    McCollough CH; Leng S; Sunnegardh J; Vrieze TJ; Yu L; Lane J; Raupach R; Stierstorfer K; Flohr T
    Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061904. PubMed ID: 23718595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of sparse basis selection on ultrasonic signal representation.
    Zhang GM; Harvey DM; Braden DR
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 45(1-4):82-91. PubMed ID: 16930664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reiterative deconvolution: New technique for time of flight estimation errors reduction in case of close proximity of two reflections.
    Svilainis L; Lukoseviciute K; Liaukonis D
    Ultrasonics; 2017 Apr; 76():154-165. PubMed ID: 28103484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sparse deconvolution of higher order tensor for fiber orientation distribution estimation.
    Feng Y; Wu Y; Rathi Y; Westin CF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Nov; 65(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 26428956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A localized Richardson-Lucy algorithm for fiber orientation estimation in high angular resolution diffusion imaging.
    Liu X; Yuan Z; Guo Z; Xu D
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2524-39. PubMed ID: 25979045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.