These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. State of the field: Are the results of science contingent or inevitable? Kinzel K Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2015 Aug; 52():55-66. PubMed ID: 26193788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science. Boon M; Van Baalen S Eur J Philos Sci; 2019; 9(1):16. PubMed ID: 30873248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Was Sir William Crookes epistemically virtuous? Kidd IJ Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2014 Dec; 48 Pt A():67-74. PubMed ID: 25091260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Against defaultism and towards localism in the contingency/inevitability conversation: Or, why we should shut up about putting-up. Aylward A Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2019 Apr; 74():30-41. PubMed ID: 31101159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Notes on a complicated relationship: scientific pluralism, epistemic relativism, and stances. Veigl SJ Synthese; 2021; 199(1-2):3485-3503. PubMed ID: 34866666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Drawing lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic: science and epistemic humility should go together. Mazzocchi F Hist Philos Life Sci; 2021 Jul; 43(3):92. PubMed ID: 34327593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomics and the conundrum of race: some epistemic and ethical considerations. Maglo KN Perspect Biol Med; 2010; 53(3):357-72. PubMed ID: 20639605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Critical issues in the history, philosophy, and sociology of astrobiology. Dick SJ Astrobiology; 2012 Oct; 12(10):906-27. PubMed ID: 23078642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to Assess the Epistemic Wrongness of Sponsorship Bias? The Case of Manufactured Certainty. Leefmann J Front Res Metr Anal; 2021; 6():599909. PubMed ID: 34027299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions between sociology and epistemology. Kvasz L Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2014 Jun; 46():78-84. PubMed ID: 25051875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hubris to humility: Tonal volume and the fundamentality of psychophysical quantities. Isaac AMC Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2017; 65-66():99-111. PubMed ID: 29195654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The benefits of acquiring interactional expertise: Why (some) philosophers of science should engage scientific communities. Plaisance KS Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2020 Oct; 83():53-62. PubMed ID: 32958281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What concept analysis in philosophy of science should be (and why competing philosophical analyses of gene concepts cannot be tested by polling scientists). Waters CK Hist Philos Life Sci; 2004; 26(1):29-58. PubMed ID: 15791805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Reductionist approaches of complex problems: an epistemological and ethical reflection]. Rivera S Vertex; 2014; 25(116):308-14. PubMed ID: 25546646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]