These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26774064)

  • 1. Inevitability, contingency, and epistemic humility.
    Kidd IJ
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2016 Feb; 55():12-9. PubMed ID: 26774064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. State of the field: Are the results of science contingent or inevitable?
    Kinzel K
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2015 Aug; 52():55-66. PubMed ID: 26193788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lockean superaddition and Lockean humility.
    Connolly PJ
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2015 Jun; 51():53-61. PubMed ID: 26227231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science.
    Boon M; Van Baalen S
    Eur J Philos Sci; 2019; 9(1):16. PubMed ID: 30873248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Was Sir William Crookes epistemically virtuous?
    Kidd IJ
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2014 Dec; 48 Pt A():67-74. PubMed ID: 25091260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Against defaultism and towards localism in the contingency/inevitability conversation: Or, why we should shut up about putting-up.
    Aylward A
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2019 Apr; 74():30-41. PubMed ID: 31101159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple discoveries, inevitability, and scientific realism.
    Tambolo L; Cevolani G
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2021 Dec; 90():30-38. PubMed ID: 34537672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does environmental science crowd out non-epistemic values?
    Gillette K; Inkpen SA; DesRoches CT
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2021 Jun; 87():81-92. PubMed ID: 34111825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Notes on a complicated relationship: scientific pluralism, epistemic relativism, and stances.
    Veigl SJ
    Synthese; 2021; 199(1-2):3485-3503. PubMed ID: 34866666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Drawing lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic: science and epistemic humility should go together.
    Mazzocchi F
    Hist Philos Life Sci; 2021 Jul; 43(3):92. PubMed ID: 34327593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomics and the conundrum of race: some epistemic and ethical considerations.
    Maglo KN
    Perspect Biol Med; 2010; 53(3):357-72. PubMed ID: 20639605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Critical issues in the history, philosophy, and sociology of astrobiology.
    Dick SJ
    Astrobiology; 2012 Oct; 12(10):906-27. PubMed ID: 23078642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to Assess the Epistemic Wrongness of Sponsorship Bias? The Case of Manufactured Certainty.
    Leefmann J
    Front Res Metr Anal; 2021; 6():599909. PubMed ID: 34027299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The mind-brain problem (I): onto-epistemological foundations].
    Goni-Saez F; Tirapu-Ustarroz J
    Rev Neurol; 2016 Aug; 63(3):130-9. PubMed ID: 27412020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific progress: Knowledge versus understanding.
    Dellsén F
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2016 Apr; 56():72-83. PubMed ID: 27083086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions between sociology and epistemology.
    Kvasz L
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2014 Jun; 46():78-84. PubMed ID: 25051875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hubris to humility: Tonal volume and the fundamentality of psychophysical quantities.
    Isaac AMC
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2017; 65-66():99-111. PubMed ID: 29195654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The benefits of acquiring interactional expertise: Why (some) philosophers of science should engage scientific communities.
    Plaisance KS
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2020 Oct; 83():53-62. PubMed ID: 32958281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What concept analysis in philosophy of science should be (and why competing philosophical analyses of gene concepts cannot be tested by polling scientists).
    Waters CK
    Hist Philos Life Sci; 2004; 26(1):29-58. PubMed ID: 15791805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Reductionist approaches of complex problems: an epistemological and ethical reflection].
    Rivera S
    Vertex; 2014; 25(116):308-14. PubMed ID: 25546646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.