These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26774209)

  • 21. Wisdom of the social versus non-social crowd in face identification.
    Jeckeln G; Hahn CA; Noyes E; Cavazos JG; O'Toole AJ
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Nov; 109(4):724-735. PubMed ID: 29504118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Telling faces together: Learning new faces through exposure to multiple instances.
    Andrews S; Jenkins R; Cursiter H; Burton AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):2041-50. PubMed ID: 25607814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Facial misidentifications arise from the erroneous activation of visual face memory.
    Wirth BE; Fisher K; Towler J; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Oct; 77():387-99. PubMed ID: 26384776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Finding an unfamiliar face in a line-up: Viewing multiple images of the target is beneficial on target-present trials but costly on target-absent trials.
    Matthews CM; Mondloch CJ
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Nov; 109(4):758-776. PubMed ID: 29658990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Smiles in face matching: Idiosyncratic information revealed through a smile improves unfamiliar face matching performance.
    Mileva M; Burton AM
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Nov; 109(4):799-811. PubMed ID: 29920996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The activation of visual face memory and explicit face recognition are delayed in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Parketny J; Towler J; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():538-47. PubMed ID: 26169316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Image variability and face matching.
    Gogan T; Beaudry J; Oldmeadow J
    Perception; 2022 Nov; 51(11):804-819. PubMed ID: 35989636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease present an own-age bias in face recognition?
    Bortolon C; Louche A; Gély-Nargeot MC; Raffard S
    Exp Gerontol; 2015 Oct; 70():46-53. PubMed ID: 26176647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Norm-based coding of facial identity in adults with autism spectrum disorder.
    Walsh JA; Maurer D; Vida MD; Rhodes G; Jeffery L; Rutherford MD
    Vision Res; 2015 Mar; 108():33-40. PubMed ID: 25576378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Task-irrelevant emotion facilitates face discrimination learning.
    Lorenzino M; Caudek C
    Vision Res; 2015 Mar; 108():56-66. PubMed ID: 25645963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Weak encoding of faces predicts socially influenced judgments of facial attractiveness.
    Schnuerch R; Koppehele-Gossel J; Gibbons H
    Soc Neurosci; 2015; 10(6):624-34. PubMed ID: 25719443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relative judgment in facial identity perception as revealed by sequential effects.
    Hsu SM; Lee JS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):264-77. PubMed ID: 26358470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of Vertical Stretching on the Extraction of Mean Identity From Faces.
    Bagaïni A; Hole G
    Perception; 2017 Sep; 46(9):1048-1061. PubMed ID: 28814203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Witnesses' blindness for their own facial recognition decisions: a field study.
    Sagana A; Sauerland M; Merckelbach H
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(5):624-36. PubMed ID: 24019073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Humans have idiosyncratic and task-specific scanpaths for judging faces.
    Kanan C; Bseiso DN; Ray NA; Hsiao JH; Cottrell GW
    Vision Res; 2015 Mar; 108():67-76. PubMed ID: 25641371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stable individual differences in unfamiliar face identification: Evidence from simultaneous and sequential matching tasks.
    Baker KA; Stabile VJ; Mondloch CJ
    Cognition; 2023 Mar; 232():105333. PubMed ID: 36508992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Repetition blindness for faces reflects identity coding but not emotion coding.
    Buttle H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Feb; 110(1):245-56. PubMed ID: 20391889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Men's judgments of women's facial attractiveness from two- and three-dimensional images are similar.
    Tigue CC; Pisanski K; O'Connor JJ; Fraccaro PJ; Feinberg DR
    J Vis; 2012 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 23132932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs.
    Weatherford DR; Erickson WB; Thomas J; Walker ME; Schein B
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Jan; 5(1):3. PubMed ID: 31993804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Normative data for two challenging tests of face matching under ecological conditions.
    Stacchi L; Huguenin-Elie E; Caldara R; Ramon M
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Feb; 5(1):8. PubMed ID: 32076893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.