466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26774602)
1. The Scarbase Duo(®): Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and validity of a compact dual scar assessment tool.
Fell M; Meirte J; Anthonissen M; Maertens K; Pleat J; Moortgat P
Burns; 2016 Mar; 42(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 26774602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - the DermaLab Combo(®).
Gankande TU; Duke JM; Danielsen PL; DeJong HM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2014 Dec; 40(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 24630817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transepidermal water loss measured with the Tewameter TM300 in burn scars.
Gardien KL; Baas DC; de Vet HC; Middelkoop E
Burns; 2016 Nov; 42(7):1455-1462. PubMed ID: 27233677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of elasticity and transepidermal water loss rate of burn scars with the Dermalab(®).
Anthonissen M; Daly D; Fieuws S; Massagé P; Van Brussel M; Vranckx J; Van den Kerckhove E
Burns; 2013 May; 39(3):420-8. PubMed ID: 23000371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interpretation of the DermaLab Combo® pigmentation and vascularity measurements in burn scar assessment: an exploratory analysis.
Gankande TU; Duke JM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2015 Sep; 41(6):1176-85. PubMed ID: 25703660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigating the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a panel of subjective and objective burn scar measurement tools.
Lee KC; Bamford A; Gardiner F; Agovino A; Ter Horst B; Bishop J; Sitch A; Grover L; Logan A; Moiemen NS
Burns; 2019 Sep; 45(6):1311-1324. PubMed ID: 31327551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A modified Vancouver Scar Scale linked with TBSA (mVSS-TBSA): Inter-rater reliability of an innovative burn scar assessment method.
Gankande TU; Wood FM; Edgar DW; Duke JM; DeJong HM; Henderson AE; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2013 Sep; 39(6):1142-9. PubMed ID: 23433706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison between laser-doppler imaging and colorimetry in the assessment of scarring: "a pilot study".
Peeters W; Anthonissen M; Deliaert A; Van der Hulst R; Van den Kerckhove E
Skin Res Technol; 2012 May; 18(2):188-91. PubMed ID: 22092605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasound is a reproducible and valid tool for measuring scar height in children with burn scars: A cross-sectional study of the psychometric properties and utility of the ultrasound and 3D camera.
Simons M; Kee EG; Kimble R; Tyack Z
Burns; 2017 Aug; 43(5):993-1001. PubMed ID: 28238405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of Repeated Measurements on Post-Burn Scars with Corneometer CM 825(®).
Anthonissen M; Daly D; Peeters R; Van Brussel M; Fieuws S; Moortgat P; Flour M; Van den Kerckhove E
Skin Res Technol; 2015 Aug; 21(3):302-12. PubMed ID: 25382262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of tissue ultrasound palpation system (TUPS) in objective scar evaluation.
Lau JC; Li-Tsang CW; Zheng YP
Burns; 2005 Jun; 31(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 15896506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colour evaluation in scars: tristimulus colorimeter, narrow-band simple reflectance meter or subjective evaluation?
Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Kreis RW; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
Burns; 2004 Mar; 30(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15019115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of repeated measurements on post-burn scars with Dermascan C.
Van den Kerckhove E; Staes F; Flour M; Stappaerts K; Boeckx W
Skin Res Technol; 2003 Feb; 9(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 12535289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct comparison of reproducibility and reliability in quantitative assessments of burn scar properties.
Baumann ME; DeBruler DM; Blackstone BN; Coffey RA; Boyce ST; Supp DM; Bailey JK; Powell HM
Burns; 2021 Mar; 47(2):466-478. PubMed ID: 32839037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of an objective scar pigmentation measurement by using a spectrocolorimeter.
Li-Tsang CW; Lau JC; Liu SK
Burns; 2003 Dec; 29(8):779-84. PubMed ID: 14636751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Objective Burn Scar Assessment in Clinical Practice Using the Cutometer©: Introduction and Validation of a Standardized Measurement Protocol.
Klimitz FJ; Neubauer H; Stolle A; Ripper S; Daeschler SC; Aman M; Boecker A; Thomas B; Kneser U; Harhaus L
J Burn Care Res; 2023 Jan; 44(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 36300728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Intra-rater reliability and validity of ultrasonography in the evaluation of hypertrophic scars caused by burns.
Lee SY; Cho YS; Kim L; Joo SY; Seo CH
Burns; 2023 Mar; 49(2):344-352. PubMed ID: 35459576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An effective procedure for skin stiffness measurement to improve Paediatric Burn Care.
Elrod J; Müller B; Mohr C; Meuli M; Mazza E; Schiestl C
Burns; 2019 Aug; 45(5):1102-1111. PubMed ID: 30833098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interrater and intrarater reliability of the Semmes Weinstein aesthesiometer to assess touch pressure threshold in burn scars.
Meirte J; Moortgat P; Truijen S; Maertens K; Lafaire C; De Cuyper L; Hubens G; Van Daele U
Burns; 2015 Sep; 41(6):1261-7. PubMed ID: 25703663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inter-rater, intra-rater, and inter-machine reliability of quantitative ultrasound measurements of the patellar tendon.
Gellhorn AC; Carlson MJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 May; 39(5):791-6. PubMed ID: 23465140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
