473 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26774663)
1. Updated recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests.
Kirkland D; Kasper P; Martus HJ; Müller L; van Benthem J; Madia F; Corvi R
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2016 Jan; 795():7-30. PubMed ID: 26774663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.
Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P
Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity test results be used to complement positive results in the Ames test and help predict carcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity? I. Reports of individual databases presented at an EURL ECVAM Workshop.
Kirkland D; Zeiger E; Madia F; Gooderham N; Kasper P; Lynch A; Morita T; Ouedraogo G; Parra Morte JM; Pfuhler S; Rogiers V; Schulz M; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; Worth A; Corvi R
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2014 Dec; 775-776():55-68. PubMed ID: 25435356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity test results be used to complement positive results in the Ames test and help predict carcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity? II. Construction and analysis of a consolidated database.
Kirkland D; Zeiger E; Madia F; Corvi R
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2014 Dec; 775-776():69-80. PubMed ID: 25435357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. GADD45a-GFP GreenScreen HC assay results for the ECVAM recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of new genotoxicity tests.
Birrell L; Cahill P; Hughes C; Tate M; Walmsley RM
Mutat Res; 2010 Jan; 695(1-2):87-95. PubMed ID: 20006735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The comet assay with multiple mouse organs: comparison of comet assay results and carcinogenicity with 208 chemicals selected from the IARC monographs and U.S. NTP Carcinogenicity Database.
Sasaki YF; Sekihashi K; Izumiyama F; Nishidate E; Saga A; Ishida K; Tsuda S
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2000 Nov; 30(6):629-799. PubMed ID: 11145306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.
Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P
Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Further analysis of Ames-negative rodent carcinogens that are only genotoxic in mammalian cells in vitro at concentrations exceeding 1 mM, including retesting of compounds of concern.
Kirkland D; Fowler P
Mutagenesis; 2010 Nov; 25(6):539-53. PubMed ID: 20720197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes.
Kirkland DJ; Henderson L; Marzin D; Müller L; Parry JM; Speit G; Tweats DJ; Williams GM
Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):88-105. PubMed ID: 16326131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro approaches to develop weight of evidence (WoE) and mode of action (MoA) discussions with positive in vitro genotoxicity results.
Kirkland DJ; Aardema M; Banduhn N; Carmichael P; Fautz R; Meunier JR; Pfuhler S
Mutagenesis; 2007 May; 22(3):161-75. PubMed ID: 17369606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests: a follow-up to an ECVAM workshop.
Kirkland D; Kasper P; Müller L; Corvi R; Speit G
Mutat Res; 2008 May; 653(1-2):99-108. PubMed ID: 18539078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the Vitotox and RadarScreen assays for the rapid assessment of genotoxicity in the early research phase of drug development.
Westerink WM; Stevenson JC; Lauwers A; Griffioen G; Horbach GJ; Schoonen WG
Mutat Res; 2009 May; 676(1-2):113-30. PubMed ID: 19393335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of in vivo erythrocyte micronucleus and transgenic rodent gene mutation tests to detect rodent carcinogens.
Morita T; Hamada S; Masumura K; Wakata A; Maniwa J; Takasawa H; Yasunaga K; Hashizume T; Honma M
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2016 May; 802():1-29. PubMed ID: 27169373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of published data for top concentration considerations in mammalian cell genotoxicity testing.
Parry JM; Parry E; Phrakonkham P; Corvi R
Mutagenesis; 2010 Nov; 25(6):531-8. PubMed ID: 20720196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Carcinogenicity categorization of chemicals-new aspects to be considered in a European perspective.
Bolt HM; Foth H; Hengstler JG; Degen GH
Toxicol Lett; 2004 Jun; 151(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 15177638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The JaCVAM international validation study on the in vivo comet assay: Selection of test chemicals.
Morita T; Uno Y; Honma M; Kojima H; Hayashi M; Tice RR; Corvi R; Schechtman L
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2015 Jul; 786-788():14-44. PubMed ID: 26212294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How to assess the mutagenic potential of cosmetic products without animal tests?
Speit G
Mutat Res; 2009 Aug; 678(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 19379833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
