1051 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26774730)
1. Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study.
Akcay M; Arslan H; Durmus N; Mese M; Capar ID
Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Jan; 48(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 26774730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming, passive ultrasonic, and sonic irrigation techniques on dentinal tubule penetration of irrigation solution: a confocal microscopic study.
Akcay M; Arslan H; Mese M; Durmus N; Capar ID
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Sep; 21(7):2205-2212. PubMed ID: 27921170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sealer penetration into dentinal tubules in the presence or absence of smear layer: a confocal laser scanning microscopic study.
Kuçi A; Alaçam T; Yavaş O; Ergul-Ulger Z; Kayaoglu G
J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1627-31. PubMed ID: 25260735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Three Final Irrigation Activation Techniques: Effects on Canal Cleanness, Smear Layer Removal, and Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Two Root Canal Sealers.
Turkel E; Onay EO; Ungor M
Photomed Laser Surg; 2017 Dec; 35(12):672-681. PubMed ID: 28437194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Tricalcium Silicate Sealers.
McMichael GE; Primus CM; Opperman LA
J Endod; 2016 Apr; 42(4):632-6. PubMed ID: 26898564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytotoxicity of GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow2, MTA Fillapex, and AH Plus on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells.
Collado-González M; Tomás-Catalá CJ; Oñate-Sánchez RE; Moraleda JM; Rodríguez-Lozano FJ
J Endod; 2017 May; 43(5):816-822. PubMed ID: 28343929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of different final irrigant activation techniques on the bond strength of an epoxy resin-based endodontic sealer: a preliminary study.
Topçuoğlu HS; Tuncay Ö; Demirbuga S; Dinçer AN; Arslan H
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):862-6. PubMed ID: 24862718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Push-out bond strength of two new calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers to root canal dentine.
Sagsen B; Ustün Y; Demirbuga S; Pala K
Int Endod J; 2011 Dec; 44(12):1088-91. PubMed ID: 21895700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Penetrability of AH plus and MTA fillapex after endodontic treatment and retreatment: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.
Kok D; Rosa RA; Barreto MS; Busanello FH; Santini MF; Pereira JR; Só MV
Microsc Res Tech; 2014 Jun; 77(6):467-71. PubMed ID: 24753317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Calcium Hydroxide Dressing on the Dentinal Tubule Penetration of 2 Different Root Canal Sealers: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopic Study.
Uzunoglu-Özyürek E; Erdoğan Ö; Aktemur Türker S
J Endod; 2018 Jun; 44(6):1018-1023. PubMed ID: 29680722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effect of Primary Root Canal Treatment on Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Calcium Silicate-based Sealers during Endodontic Retreatment.
Eğemen A; Belli S
J Endod; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1169-1177. PubMed ID: 35667566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of different irrigation techniques on the penetration depth of different sealers into dentinal tubules by confocal laser scanning microscope: An
Kachari M; Adarsha MS; Meena N; Kumari A; Sudhanva ME; Vijayalakshmi L
J Conserv Dent Endod; 2024 Apr; 27(4):388-392. PubMed ID: 38779208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of final irrigation on the penetrability of an epoxy resin-based sealer into dentinal tubules: a confocal microscopy study.
Jardine AP; Rosa RA; Santini MF; Wagner M; Só MV; Kuga MC; Pereira JR; Kopper PM
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jan; 20(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 25903061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of laser-activated irrigation of 1320-nanometer Nd:YAG laser on sealer penetration in curved root canals.
Moon YM; Kim HC; Bae KS; Baek SH; Shon WJ; Lee W
J Endod; 2012 Apr; 38(4):531-5. PubMed ID: 22414844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the effect of different irrigation activation techniques on the dentin tubules penetration of two different root canal sealers by laser scanning confocal microscopy.
Kaplan F; Erdemir A
Microsc Res Tech; 2023 Jul; 86(7):791-802. PubMed ID: 37158110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of final irrigation regimen on sealer penetration in curved root canals.
Moon YM; Shon WJ; Baek SH; Bae KS; Kum KY; Lee W
J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):732-6. PubMed ID: 20307754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of sealer penetration using the EndoVac irrigation system and conventional needle root canal irrigation.
Kara Tuncer A; Unal B
J Endod; 2014 May; 40(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 24767552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of prior calcium hydroxide intracanal placement on the bond strength of two calcium silicate-based and an epoxy resin-based endodontic sealer.
Amin SA; Seyam RS; El-Samman MA
J Endod; 2012 May; 38(5):696-9. PubMed ID: 22515906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dentin moisture conditions affect the adhesion of root canal sealers.
Nagas E; Uyanik MO; Eymirli A; Cehreli ZC; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV; Durmaz V
J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 22244645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentin.
Dem K; Wu Y; Kaminga AC; Dai Z; Cao X; Zhu B
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Aug; 19(1):181. PubMed ID: 31395103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
