These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26774825)

  • 1. Strong heterogeneity of outcome reporting in systematic reviews.
    Sautenet B; Contentin L; Bigot A; Giraudeau B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():93-9. PubMed ID: 26774825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More than half of systematic reviews have relevant core outcome sets.
    Saldanha IJ; Dodd S; Gorst SL; Williamson PR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 136():168-179. PubMed ID: 33974970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study found increasing use of core outcome sets in Cochrane systematic reviews and identified facilitators and barriers.
    Saldanha IJ; Hughes KL; Dodd S; Lasserson T; Kirkham JJ; Wu Y; Lucas SW; Williamson PR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 May; 169():111277. PubMed ID: 38428540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of the heterogeneity of systematic reviews on nutrition support for burn patients with Meta-regression algorithm].
    Cai B; Jiang H; Yang H; Sun MW; Wang WY; Zeng J
    Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 29(4):344-8. PubMed ID: 24351533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcome reporting in randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of gastroschisis treatment: a systematic review.
    Ross AR; Hall NJ
    J Pediatr Surg; 2016 Aug; 51(8):1385-9. PubMed ID: 27312236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity subgroup analysis based on single-center vs. multi-center trial status when interpreting meta-analyses pooled estimates: the logical way forward.
    Alexander PE; Bonner AJ; Agarwal A; Li SA; Hariharan A; Izhar Z; Bhatnagar N; Alba C; Akl EA; Fei Y; Guyatt GH; Beyene J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():80-92. PubMed ID: 26597972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Core outcomes were rarely reported overall in systematic reviews on acupuncture for osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional meta-epidemiological study.
    Hu T; Long Y; Chen R; Yang Z; Liu L; Huang L; Huang J; Liao G; Du L
    Acupunct Med; 2023 Jun; 41(3):142-150. PubMed ID: 35983785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.
    Moher D; Tetzlaff J; Tricco AC; Sampson M; Altman DG
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e78. PubMed ID: 17388659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Liu J; Huda F; Atieh M
    J Periodontal Res; 2014 Apr; 49(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 23668725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Tsujimoto Y; Tsujimoto H; Kataoka Y; Kimachi M; Shimizu S; Ikenoue T; Fukuma S; Yamamoto Y; Fukuhara S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 84():54-60. PubMed ID: 28242481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reporting and handling missing outcome data in mental health: a systematic review of Cochrane systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Spineli LM; Pandis N; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):175-87. PubMed ID: 26099485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increasing number of databases searched in systematic reviews and meta-analyses between 1994 and 2014.
    Lam MT; McDiarmid M
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Oct; 104(4):284-289. PubMed ID: 27822149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses - Literature-based Recommendations for Evaluating Strengths, Weaknesses, and Clinical Value.
    Beitz JM; Bolton LL
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2015 Nov; 61(11):26-42. PubMed ID: 26544016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in treating knee osteoarthritis: assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews with ROBIS tool.
    Xing D; Wang B; Zhang W; Yang Z; Hou Y; Chen Y; Lin J
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2017 Nov; 20(11):1658-1673. PubMed ID: 29044993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data.
    Amato L; Fusco D; Acampora A; Bontempi K; Rosa AC; Colais P; Cruciani F; D'Ovidio M; Mataloni F; Minozzi S; Mitrova Z; Pinnarelli L; Saulle R; Soldati S; Sorge C; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Davoli M
    Epidemiol Prev; 2017; 41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128. PubMed ID: 29205995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews.
    Hartling L; Featherstone R; Nuspl M; Shave K; Dryden DM; Vandermeer B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):64. PubMed ID: 28420349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.