These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26774825)

  • 41. A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity.
    Yavchitz A; Ravaud P; Altman DG; Moher D; Hrobjartsson A; Lasserson T; Boutron I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():56-65. PubMed ID: 26845744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health.
    Hughes KL; Clarke M; Williamson PR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 129():114-123. PubMed ID: 32987162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cochrane and the COMET initiative: developing the evidence base in oral medicine.
    Taylor J; Walsh T; Worthington H; Brocklehurst P; Pemberton MN; Glenny AM
    Br Dent J; 2017 Dec; 223(9):729-732. PubMed ID: 29097795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in coloproctology: interpretation and potential pitfalls.
    Wille-Jørgensen P; Renehan AG
    Colorectal Dis; 2008 Jan; 10(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 18005187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Are Orthopaedic Systematic Reviews Overly Prevalent?
    Provencher MT; Brand JC; Rossi MJ; Lubowitz JH
    Arthroscopy; 2016 Jun; 32(6):955-6. PubMed ID: 27263759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Meta-analysis in otolaryngology.
    Alsarraf R; Alsarraf NW; Kato BM; Goldman ND
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Jun; 126(6):711-6. PubMed ID: 10864106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. DAMASCENE and Meta-Ecological Research: A Bridge Too Far.
    Moyé L
    Circ Res; 2014 Aug; 115(5):484-7. PubMed ID: 25006188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Outcome measures measure outcomes, not effects of intervention.
    Herbert R; Jamtvedt G; Mead J; Hagen KB
    Aust J Physiother; 2005; 51(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 15748119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Examining the Distribution, Modularity, and Community Structure in Article Networks for Systematic Reviews.
    Ji X; Machiraju R; Ritter A; Yen PY
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2015; 2015():1927-36. PubMed ID: 26958292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. On archimedes.
    Lopez T
    Arch Dis Child; 2003 Feb; 88(2):176-7; author reply 176-7. PubMed ID: 12538332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Do systematic reviews still exclude studies with "no relevant outcome data"?
    Dwan KM; Williamson PR; Kirkham JJ
    BMJ; 2017 Aug; 358():j3919. PubMed ID: 28827402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Meta-analysis and the meta-epidemiology of clinical research. Registration of trials should be required by editors and registering agencies.
    Julian D
    BMJ; 1998 Jan; 316(7127):311. PubMed ID: 9472545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Fidelity in sensory integration intervention research.
    Parham LD; Cohn ES; Spitzer S; Koomar JA; Miller LJ; Burke JP; Brett-Green B; Mailloux Z; May-Benson TA; Roley SS; Schaaf RC; Schoen SA; Summers CA
    Am J Occup Ther; 2007; 61(2):216-27. PubMed ID: 17436844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Meta-analytical methods to identify who benefits most from treatments: daft, deluded, or deft approach?
    Fisher DJ; Carpenter JR; Morris TP; Freeman SC; Tierney JF
    BMJ; 2017 Mar; 356():j573. PubMed ID: 28258124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessment of heterogeneity in meta-analyses.
    Hoaglin DC
    JAMA; 2014 Dec; 312(21):2286-7. PubMed ID: 25462001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessment of heterogeneity in meta-analyses--reply.
    Dechartres A; Trinquart L; Ravaud P
    JAMA; 2014 Dec; 312(21):2287. PubMed ID: 25462002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Is meta-analysis currently a prerequisite for every relevant literature analysis?].
    Selbmann HK; Ohmann G; Lorenz W; Bollschweiler E
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1993; 378(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 8412440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Establishment of a core outcome set for burn care research: development and international consensus.
    Young A; Davies A; Tsang C; Kirkham J; Potokar T; Gibran N; Tyack Z; Meirte J; Harada T; Dheansa B; Dumville J; Metcalfe C; Ahuja R; Wood F; Gaskell S; Brookes S; Smailes S; Jeschke M; Cinar MA; Zia N; Moghazy A; Mathers J; Falder S; Edgar D; Blazeby JM
    BMJ Med; 2022; 1(1):e000183. PubMed ID: 36936572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Range and Consistency of Cardiovascular Outcomes Reported by Clinical Trials in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review.
    Wilson GJ; Van K; O'Lone E; Tong A; Craig JC; Sautenet B; Budde K; Forfang D; Gill J; Herrington WG; Jafar TH; Johnson DW; Krane V; Levin A; Malyszko J; Rossignol P; Sawinski D; Scholes-Robertons N; Strippoli G; Wang A; Winkelmayer WC; Hawley CM; Viecelli AK
    Transplant Direct; 2023 Jan; 9(1):e1398. PubMed ID: 36518792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Study protocol to develop a core outcome set for thyroid dysfunction to bridge the unmet needs of patient-centred care.
    Ooi CP; Yusof Khan AHK; Abdul Manaf R; Mustafa N; Sukor N; Williamson PR; Kamaruddin NA
    BMJ Open; 2021 Jul; 11(7):e050231. PubMed ID: 34321306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.