These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26776063)

  • 21. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test data: a bivariate Bayesian modeling approach.
    Verde PE
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3088-102. PubMed ID: 21170904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimum binary cut-off threshold of a diagnostic test: comparison of different methods using Monte Carlo technique.
    Reibnegger G; Schrabmair W
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2014 Nov; 14():99. PubMed ID: 25421000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Characteristics of good diagnostic studies.
    Mol BW; Lijmer JG; Evers JL; Bossuyt PM
    Semin Reprod Med; 2003 Feb; 21(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 12806556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Anticipating missing reference standard data when planning diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Naaktgeboren CA; de Groot JA; Rutjes AW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Moons KG
    BMJ; 2016 Feb; 352():i402. PubMed ID: 26861453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The diagnostic "gold standard" in oncology: increasing importance and increasing concerns.
    Markman M
    Curr Oncol Rep; 2006 Jul; 8(4):237-8. PubMed ID: 17269188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using extended Rasch models to assess validity of diagnostic tests in the presence of a reference standard.
    Viallon V; Ecosse E; Mesbah M; Pouchot J; Coste J
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(4):376-93. PubMed ID: 23270981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sensitivity studies for quantitative assays: use of censored data analysis.
    Weusten JJ; Wouters PA; van Zuijlen MC
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(23):3629-40. PubMed ID: 14652865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Statistics for quantifying heterogeneity in univariate and bivariate meta-analyses of binary data: the case of meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.
    Zhou Y; Dendukuri N
    Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(16):2701-17. PubMed ID: 24903142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A simulation study into the performance of "optimal" diagnostic thresholds in the population:"Large" effect sizes are not enough.
    Hirschfeld G; do Brasil PE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 24447590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating medical diagnostic tests at the subunit level in the presence of verification bias.
    Barnhart HX; Kosinski AS
    Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2161-76. PubMed ID: 12820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Good interpretation of the results of a diagnostic test.
    Veziris N; Jarlier V
    Clin Infect Dis; 2003 Oct; 37(8):1143; author reply 1143-4. PubMed ID: 14523783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Re: Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
    Formann AK; Böhning D
    Biostatistics; 2008 Oct; 9(4):777-8. PubMed ID: 18718923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [[Evaluation of medical diagnostic tests: application of Bayes theorem, ROC-curve and Kappa-test] ].
    Lugosi L; Molnár I
    Orv Hetil; 2000 Jul; 141(31):1725-8. PubMed ID: 10976197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Problems in detecting misfit of latent class models in diagnostic research without a gold standard were shown.
    van Smeden M; Oberski DL; Reitsma JB; Vermunt JK; Moons KG; de Groot JA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():158-66. PubMed ID: 26628335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reference values: no need for confusion.
    Obuchowski NA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Jun; 137(6):1572-3. PubMed ID: 19464491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using evidence to determine diagnostic test efficacy.
    Replogle WH; Johnson WD; Hoover KW
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2009; 6(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 19413584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Statistical topics in the laboratory sciences.
    Parvin CA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 404():353-75. PubMed ID: 18450059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reporting diagnostic tests.
    Straus SE
    BMJ; 2003 Jan; 326(7379):3-4. PubMed ID: 12511433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Meta-analysis for diagnostic accuracy studies: a new statistical model using beta-binomial distributions and bivariate copulas.
    Kuss O; Hoyer A; Solms A
    Stat Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 23873593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Non-inferiority and superiority tests for partially matched data when a constraint is placed on the number of new tests.
    van de Ven PM; Berkhof J
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(15):2515-28. PubMed ID: 23203862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.