These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. From molecules to dynamic biological communities. McDonald D; Vázquez-Baeza Y; Walters WA; Caporaso JG; Knight R Biol Philos; 2013 Mar; 28(2):241-259. PubMed ID: 23483075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Metabolic dependencies drive species co-occurrence in diverse microbial communities. Zelezniak A; Andrejev S; Ponomarova O; Mende DR; Bork P; Patil KR Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 May; 112(20):6449-54. PubMed ID: 25941371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. MetaSort untangles metagenome assembly by reducing microbial community complexity. Ji P; Zhang Y; Wang J; Zhao F Nat Commun; 2017 Jan; 8():14306. PubMed ID: 28112173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of two bioinformatics tools used to characterize the microbial diversity and predictive functional attributes of microbial mats from Lake Obersee, Antarctica. Koo H; Hakim JA; Morrow CD; Eipers PG; Davila A; Andersen DT; Bej AK J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Sep; 140():15-22. PubMed ID: 28655556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Deciphering interactions between the gut microbiota and the immune system via microbial cultivation and minimal microbiomes. Clavel T; Gomes-Neto JC; Lagkouvardos I; Ramer-Tait AE Immunol Rev; 2017 Sep; 279(1):8-22. PubMed ID: 28856739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Greater than the sum of their parts: characterizing plant microbiomes at the community-level. Lebeis SL Curr Opin Plant Biol; 2015 Apr; 24():82-6. PubMed ID: 25710740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Constraint-based stoichiometric modelling from single organisms to microbial communities. Gottstein W; Olivier BG; Bruggeman FJ; Teusink B J R Soc Interface; 2016 Nov; 13(124):. PubMed ID: 28334697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Multi -omics and metabolic modelling pipelines: challenges and tools for systems microbiology. Fondi M; Liò P Microbiol Res; 2015 Feb; 171():52-64. PubMed ID: 25644953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Quorum Sensing Communication Modules for Microbial Consortia. Scott SR; Hasty J ACS Synth Biol; 2016 Sep; 5(9):969-77. PubMed ID: 27172092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Methodologies for probing the metatranscriptome of grassland soil. Garoutte A; Cardenas E; Tiedje J; Howe A J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Dec; 131():122-129. PubMed ID: 27793585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. Edwards J; Johnson C; Santos-Medellín C; Lurie E; Podishetty NK; Bhatnagar S; Eisen JA; Sundaresan V Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Feb; 112(8):E911-20. PubMed ID: 25605935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Transcriptional Activities of the Microbial Consortium Living with the Marine Nitrogen-Fixing Cyanobacterium Trichodesmium Reveal Potential Roles in Community-Level Nitrogen Cycling. Lee MD; Webb EA; Walworth NG; Fu FX; Held NA; Saito MA; Hutchins DA Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 84(1):. PubMed ID: 29054872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. More is Different: Metabolic Modeling of Diverse Microbial Communities. Diener C; Gibbons SM mSystems; 2023 Apr; 8(2):e0127022. PubMed ID: 36943046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Stress and stability: applying the Anna Karenina principle to animal microbiomes. Zaneveld JR; McMinds R; Vega Thurber R Nat Microbiol; 2017 Aug; 2():17121. PubMed ID: 28836573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Agent-Based Modeling of Microbial Communities. Nagarajan K; Ni C; Lu T ACS Synth Biol; 2022 Nov; 11(11):3564-3574. PubMed ID: 36315012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Key players and team play: anaerobic microbial communities in hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifers. Kleinsteuber S; Schleinitz KM; Vogt C Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 May; 94(4):851-73. PubMed ID: 22476263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]