These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26776265)

  • 1. The consequence of day-to-day stochastic dose deviation from the planned dose in fractionated radiation therapy.
    Paul S; Roy PK
    Math Biosci Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):159-70. PubMed ID: 26776265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of stochastic fluctuation in radiation dose-rate on cell survival following fractionated radiation therapy.
    Paul S; Roy PK
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(6):1561-73. PubMed ID: 22391148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanistic formulation of a lineal-quadratic-linear (LQL) model: split-dose experiments and exponentially decaying sources.
    Guerrero M; Carlone M
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4173-81. PubMed ID: 20879577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimization of the fractionated irradiation scheme considering physical doses to tumor and organ at risk based on dose-volume histograms.
    Sugano Y; Mizuta M; Takao S; Shirato H; Sutherland KL; Date H
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6203-10. PubMed ID: 26520713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of patient variation on standard- and hypo-fractionated radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
    Xiong W; Li J; Ma CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(7):1483-92. PubMed ID: 15798338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strategy for stochastic dose-rate induced enhanced elimination of malignant tumour without dose escalation.
    Paul S; Roy PK
    Math Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 33(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 26049156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probability dynamics of a repopulating tumor in case of fractionated external radiotherapy.
    Stavreva N; Stavrev P; Fallone BG
    Phys Med; 2009 Dec; 25(4):181-91. PubMed ID: 19345599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of the equivalent uniform stochastic dose (EUSD) to TCP calculations incorporating dose uncertainty and fractionation effects.
    Zavgorodni S
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2008 Mar; 31(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18488958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. EUD-based radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation: incorporating physical and Monte Carlo statistical dose uncertainties.
    Cranmer-Sargison G; Zavgorodni S
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4097-109. PubMed ID: 16177533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Markov decision process approach to temporal modulation of dose fractions in radiation therapy planning.
    Kim M; Ghate A; Phillips MH
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(14):4455-76. PubMed ID: 19556687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetric and radiobiological consequences of computed tomography-guided adaptive strategies for intensity modulated radiation therapy of the prostate.
    Battista JJ; Johnson C; Turnbull D; Kempe J; Bzdusek K; Van Dyk J; Bauman G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):874-80. PubMed ID: 23978708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practical aspects of inverse-planned intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a radiation treatment planner's perspective.
    Parker W; Patrocinio H
    Can J Urol; 2005 Jun; 12 Suppl 2():48-52. PubMed ID: 16018834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of radiation protraction to escalate biologically effective dose to the treatment target.
    Kuperman VY; Spradlin GS
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6553-60. PubMed ID: 22149837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The application of the linear quadratic model to compensate the effects of prolonged fraction delivery time on a Balb/C breast adenocarcinoma tumor: An in vivo study.
    Nikzad S; Hashemi B; Hasan ZS; Mozdarani H; Baradaran-Ghahfarokhi M; Amini P
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2016; 92(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 26630280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Formulating adaptive radiation therapy (ART) treatment planning into a closed-loop control framework.
    de la Zerda A; Armbruster B; Xing L
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4137-53. PubMed ID: 17664599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting 2-year survival for radiation regimens in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
    Sharieff W; Okawara G; Tsakiridis T; Wright J
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2013 Dec; 25(12):697-705. PubMed ID: 23962917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breathing interplay effects during proton beam scanning: simulation and statistical analysis.
    Seco J; Robertson D; Trofimov A; Paganetti H
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(14):N283-94. PubMed ID: 19550002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new approach to computing normal tissue complication probability of an intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment with stereotactic radiotherapy boost of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a case study.
    Leung LH; Wong WK; Cheng AC; Kan MW; Cheung JY; Lam NK; Yuen KT; Yau CC
    Med Dosim; 2011; 36(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 20510601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of linac based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and tomotherapy treatment plans for skull-base tumors.
    Soisson ET; Tomé WA; Richards GM; Mehta MP
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 16490269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver tumors: impact of daily setup corrections and day-to-day anatomic variations on dose in target and organs at risk.
    Méndez Romero A; Zinkstok RT; Wunderink W; van Os RM; Joosten H; Seppenwoolde Y; Nowak PJ; Brandwijk RP; Verhoef C; IJzermans JN; Levendag PC; Heijmen BJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(4):1201-8. PubMed ID: 19386435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.