168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26776314)
1. Educational effectiveness of gynaecological teaching associates: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial.
Duffy JM; Chequer S; Braddy A; Mylan S; Royuela A; Zamora J; Ip J; Hayden S; Showell M; Kinnersley P; Chenoy R; Westwood OM; Khan KS; Cushing A
BJOG; 2016 May; 123(6):1005-10. PubMed ID: 26776314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effective analysis of teaching pelvic examination skills using Gynaecology Teaching Associates (GTAs) compared with manikin models (The CEAT Study).
Janjua A; Roberts T; Okeahialam N; Clark TJ
BMJ Open; 2018 Jun; 8(6):e015823. PubMed ID: 29934378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effectiveness of gynaecology teaching associates in teaching pelvic examination to medical students: a randomised controlled trial.
Janjua A; Smith P; Chu J; Raut N; Malick S; Gallos I; Singh R; Irani S; Gupta JK; Parle J; Clark TJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Mar; 210():58-63. PubMed ID: 27940395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effectiveness of gynaecological teaching associates in teaching pelvic examination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Smith PP; Choudhury S; Clark TJ
Med Educ; 2015 Dec; 49(12):1197-206. PubMed ID: 26611185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cross-sectional study on teaching pelvic examination in medical schools in the UK (the COTES study).
Janjua A; Smith P; Clark TJ
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 May; 38(4):521-525. PubMed ID: 29390941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pelvic examination skills training with genital teaching associates and a pelvic simulator: does sequence matter?
Seago BL; Ketchum JM; Willett RM
Simul Healthc; 2012 Apr; 7(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 22333882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can gynaecology teaching associates provide high quality effective training for medical students in the United Kingdom? Comparative study.
Pickard S; Baraitser P; Rymer J; Piper J
BMJ; 2003 Dec; 327(7428):1389-92. PubMed ID: 14670887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can we teach core clinical obstetrics and gynaecology skills using low fidelity simulation in an interprofessional setting?
Kumar A; Gilmour C; Nestel D; Aldridge R; McLelland G; Wallace E
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Dec; 54(6):589-92. PubMed ID: 25308468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does medical students' gender affect their clinical learning of gynaecological examination? A retrospective cohort study.
Wallbridge T; Holden A; Picton A; Gupta J
Postgrad Med J; 2018 Jun; 94(1112):325-329. PubMed ID: 29695538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Learning the gynecological examination on low-fidelity simulation: Impact on the feelings of medical students].
Hugon-Rodin J; Sonigo C; Drummond D; Grynberg M; Rodin T; Plu-Bureau G; Tesniere A
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 May; 45(5):291-298. PubMed ID: 28461236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Student attendance and academic performance in undergraduate obstetrics/gynecology clinical rotations.
Deane RP; Murphy DJ
JAMA; 2013 Dec; 310(21):2282-8. PubMed ID: 24302091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Team Objective Structured Bedside Assessment (TOSBA) as formative assessment in undergraduate Obstetrics and Gynaecology: a cohort study.
Deane RP; Joyce P; Murphy DJ
BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():172. PubMed ID: 26453191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving Medical Student Comfort and Competence in Performing Gynecological Exams: A Systematic Review.
Kirubarajan A; Li X; Got T; Yau M; Sobel M
Acad Med; 2021 Sep; 96(9):1353-1365. PubMed ID: 33883396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can physicians be replaced with gynecological teaching women to train medical students in their first pelvic examination? A pilot study from Northern Sweden.
Grankvist O; Olofsson AD; Isaksson RM
Patient Educ Couns; 2014 Jul; 96(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 24854066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of a Multidimensional Technical Skills Training Session Before Obstetrics and Gynaecology Clerkship Rotation on Performance and Exposure.
Mitric C; Chow K; Krishnamurthy S; Zeng XZ; Leung A
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Oct; 40(10):1315-1323. PubMed ID: 30390945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simulation training for pelvic examination: A systematic review.
Le Lous M; Dion L; Le Ray C
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Dec; 52(10):102666. PubMed ID: 37739264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating pelvic examination training: does faculty involvement make a difference? A randomized controlled trial.
Pradhan A; Ebert G; Brug P; Swee D; Ananth CV
Teach Learn Med; 2010 Oct; 22(4):293-7. PubMed ID: 20936577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hybrid simulation compared to manikin alone in teaching pelvic examinations: a randomised control trial.
Manley K; Edwards S; Mears J; Siassakos D
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn; 2016; 2(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 35516450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pelvic and breast examination skills curricula in United States medical schools: a survey of obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors.
Dugoff L; Pradhan A; Casey P; Dalrymple JL; Abbott JF; Buery-Joyner SD; Chuang A; Cullimore AJ; Forstein DA; Hampton BS; Kaczmarczyk JM; Katz NT; Nuthalapaty FS; Page-Ramsey SM; Wolf A; Hueppchen NA
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Dec; 16(1):314. PubMed ID: 27986086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: a randomised trial.
Duggan PM; Palmer E; Devitt P
BMC Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 7():25. PubMed ID: 17655773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
