BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26776451)

  • 1. Irreproducibility in Preclinical Biomedical Research: Perceptions, Uncertainties, and Knowledge Gaps.
    Jarvis MF; Williams M
    Trends Pharmacol Sci; 2016 Apr; 37(4):290-302. PubMed ID: 26776451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unknown unknowns in biomedical research: does an inability to deal with ambiguity contribute to issues of irreproducibility?
    Mullane K; Williams M
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2015 Sep; 97(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 26239804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancing reproducibility: Failures from Reproducibility Initiatives underline core challenges.
    Mullane K; Williams M
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 138():7-18. PubMed ID: 28396196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The nature of the biological material and the irreproducibility problem in biomedical research.
    Papamokos GV
    EMBO J; 2019 Feb; 38(4):. PubMed ID: 30617085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decatastrophizing research irreproducibility.
    Jarvis MF
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2024 Feb; ():116090. PubMed ID: 38408680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reagent Validation to Facilitate Experimental Reproducibility.
    Williams M
    Curr Protoc Pharmacol; 2018 Jun; 81(1):e40. PubMed ID: 29927084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The increasing urgency for standards in basic biologic research.
    Freedman LP; Inglese J
    Cancer Res; 2014 Aug; 74(15):4024-9. PubMed ID: 25035389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility in science: improving the standard for basic and preclinical research.
    Begley CG; Ioannidis JP
    Circ Res; 2015 Jan; 116(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 25552691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Elevating standards for discoveries reported in ACS Chemical Neuroscience: new criteria to enhance reproducibility, experimental transparency, reliability, and the value of negative data.
    Lindsley CW
    ACS Chem Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 5(10):868-9. PubMed ID: 25315492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.
    Green AK; Reeder-Hayes KE; Corty RW; Basch E; Milowsky MI; Dusetzina SB; Bennett AV; Wood WA
    Oncologist; 2015 May; 20(5):464-e20. PubMed ID: 25876994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The preclinical data forum network: A new ECNP initiative to improve data quality and robustness for (preclinical) neuroscience.
    Steckler T; Brose K; Haas M; Kas MJ; Koustova E; Bespalov A;
    Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2015 Oct; 25(10):1803-7. PubMed ID: 26073278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeat: a framework to assess empirical reproducibility in biomedical research.
    McIntosh LD; Juehne A; Vitale CRH; Liu X; Alcoser R; Lukas JC; Evanoff B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):143. PubMed ID: 28923006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can cancer researchers accurately judge whether preclinical reports will reproduce?
    Benjamin D; Mandel DR; Kimmelman J
    PLoS Biol; 2017 Jun; 15(6):e2002212. PubMed ID: 28662052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Road to Reproducibility in Animal Research.
    Jilka RL
    J Bone Miner Res; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1317-9. PubMed ID: 27255286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Irreproducibility is not a sign of failure, but an inspiration for fresh ideas.
    Nature; 2020 Feb; 578(7794):191-192. PubMed ID: 32051608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Guide to Reproducibility in Preclinical Research.
    Samsa G; Samsa L
    Acad Med; 2019 Jan; 94(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 29995667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research.
    Simera I; Moher D; Hoey J; Schulz KF; Altman DG
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2010 Jan; 40(1):35-53. PubMed ID: 20055895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Progress in standards for reporting omics data.
    Taylor CF
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2007 May; 10(3):254-63. PubMed ID: 17554851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transparent, reproducible data.
    Pulverer B
    EMBO J; 2014 Nov; 33(22):2597. PubMed ID: 25342857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychology's Replication Crisis and Clinical Psychological Science.
    Tackett JL; Brandes CM; King KM; Markon KE
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2019 May; 15():579-604. PubMed ID: 30673512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.