BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26776673)

  • 1. Technique for the Laparoscopic Removal of Essure Microinserts.
    Mahmoud MS
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):472. PubMed ID: 26776673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Essure Removal for the Treatment of Device-Attributed Symptoms: An Expanded Case Series and Follow-up Survey.
    Clark NV; Rademaker D; Mushinski AA; Ajao MO; Cohen SL; Einarsson JI
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):971-976. PubMed ID: 28599885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discordant relationship between Essure microinsert position and tubal occlusion.
    Hou MY
    BMJ Case Rep; 2016 Jul; 2016():. PubMed ID: 27466315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removal of Essure Sterilization Devices: A Retrospective Cohort Study in the Netherlands.
    Maassen LW; van Gastel DM; Haveman I; Bongers MY; Veersema S
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1056-1062. PubMed ID: 30340052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic Cornuectomy as a Technique for Removal of Essure Microinserts.
    Thiel L; Rattray D; Thiel J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):10. PubMed ID: 27422719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two Surgical Techniques for Essure Device Ablation: The Hysteroscopic Way and the Laparoscopic Way by Salpingectomy with Tubal Interstitial Resection.
    Tissot M; Petry S; Lecointre L; Faller E; Baldauf JJ; Akladios C; Boisrame T
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):603. PubMed ID: 30064007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes of laparoscopic removal of the Essure sterilization device for pelvic pain: a case series.
    Casey J; Aguirre F; Yunker A
    Contraception; 2016 Aug; 94(2):190-2. PubMed ID: 27063056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Persistent pain after hysteroscopic sterilization with microinserts.
    Beckwith AW
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 111(2 Pt 2):511-2. PubMed ID: 18239003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic Essure® Device Removal by En Bloc Salpingectomy-Cornuectomy with Intraoperative X-Ray Checking: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Miquel L; Crochet P; Francini S; Compan C; Boubli L; Agostini A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):697-703. PubMed ID: 31212073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Essure® and chronic pelvic pain: a population-based cohort.
    Arjona Berral JE; Rodríguez Jiménez B; Velasco Sánchez E; Povedano Cañizares B; Monserrat Jordan J; Lorente Gonzalez J; Castelo-Branco C
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Nov; 34(8):712-3. PubMed ID: 24910944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient Outcomes Following Injury from Hysteroscopic Sterilization.
    Sills ES; Dalton MM
    Surg Technol Int; 2016 Apr; 28():165-9. PubMed ID: 27042777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Techniques for removal of the Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion device.
    Lannon BM; Lee SY
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):497.e13-4. PubMed ID: 17397840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical techniques for the removal of Essure
    Chene G; Cerruto E; Merviel P; Agostini A; Crochet P; Giraudet G; Capmas P; Fernandez H; Graesslin O
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2021 Oct; 26(5):404-412. PubMed ID: 34096440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic salpingectomy and removal of Essure hysteroscopic sterilisation device: a case series.
    Johal T; Kuruba N; Sule M; Mukhopadhyay S; Raje G
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2018 Jun; 23(3):227-230. PubMed ID: 29842838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasound assessment of the Essure contraceptive devices: is three-dimensional ultrasound really needed?
    Paladini D; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Coppola C; Zizolfi B; Pastore G; Nappi C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 25241073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Essure Surgical Removal and Subsequent Symptom Resolution: Case Series and Follow-Up Survey.
    Brito LG; Cohen SL; Goggins ER; Wang KC; Einarsson JI
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(5):910-3. PubMed ID: 25843521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorrect position of Essure microinserts 3 months after successful bilateral placement.
    Gerritse MB; Veersema S; Timmermans A; Brölmann HA
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):930.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18945426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dislodged Essure microinsert.
    Booker CJ; Yarwood RL; Dodson WC
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):964-5. PubMed ID: 18054922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Essure removal: comparison of two minimally invasive approaches.
    Gracia M; Herráez A; Coronado P
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Jul; 114(1):187-188. PubMed ID: 32622410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraoperative Factors that Predict the Successful Placement of Essure Microinserts.
    Arthuis CJ; Simon EG; Hébert T; Marret H
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 28390945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.