These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26776890)

  • 1. Common Factor Analysis Versus Principal Component Analysis: Differential Bias in Representing Model Parameters?
    Widaman KF
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1993 Jul; 28(3):263-311. PubMed ID: 26776890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: choice for symptom cluster research.
    Kim HJ
    Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci); 2008 Mar; 2(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 25031108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Evaluation of the Effects of Variable Sampling On Component, Image, and Factor Analysis.
    Velicer WF; Fava JL
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1987 Apr; 22(2):193-209. PubMed ID: 26782065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The joint structure of normal and pathological personality: further evidence for a dimensional model.
    Hengartner MP; Ajdacic-Gross V; Rodgers S; Müller M; Rössler W
    Compr Psychiatry; 2014 Apr; 55(3):667-74. PubMed ID: 24314825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Component Analysis versus Common Factor Analysis: Some issues in Selecting an Appropriate Procedure.
    Velicer WF; Jackson DN
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1990 Jan; 25(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 26741964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Empirical Comparison Of The Similarity Of Principal Component, Image, And Factor Patterns.
    Velicer WF
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1977 Jan; 12(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 26804141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.
    Meredith W; Teresi JA
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. PubMed ID: 17060838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of multivariate analysis to extract latent variables related to level of production and lactation persistency in dairy cattle.
    Macciotta NP; Vicario D; Cappio-Borlino A
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Aug; 89(8):3188-94. PubMed ID: 16840636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sparse Versus Simple Structure Loadings.
    Trendafilov NT; Adachi K
    Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):776-90. PubMed ID: 25080868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimizing principal components analysis of event-related potentials: matrix type, factor loading weighting, extraction, and rotations.
    Dien J; Beal DJ; Berg P
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug; 116(8):1808-25. PubMed ID: 15996897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genome screen for a combined bone phenotype using principal component analysis: the Framingham study.
    Karasik D; Cupples LA; Hannan MT; Kiel DP
    Bone; 2004 Mar; 34(3):547-56. PubMed ID: 15003802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [French version of TASTE (test for the ability and evaluation)].
    Masson AM; Cadot M; Pereira AM; Depreeuw E; Ansseau M
    Encephale; 2001; 27(6):527-38. PubMed ID: 11865560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
    Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factor analysis of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale in Parkinson's disease.
    Broen MP; Moonen AJ; Kuijf ML; Dujardin K; Marsh L; Richard IH; Starkstein SE; Martinez-Martin P; Leentjens AF
    Parkinsonism Relat Disord; 2015 Feb; 21(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 25523963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Dyadic Adjustment Scale: clinical interest of a revision and validation of an abbreviated form].
    Antoine P; Christophe V; Nandrino JL
    Encephale; 2008 Jan; 34(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 18514149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Principal component analysis of behavioural individual differences suggests that particular aspects of visual working memory may relate to specific aspects of attention.
    Machizawa MG; Driver J
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1518-26. PubMed ID: 21130786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constructing bootstrap confidence intervals for principal component loadings in the presence of missing data: a multiple-imputation approach.
    van Ginkel JR; Kiers HA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):498-515. PubMed ID: 21973098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A principal components analysis of negative affect-related constructs relevant to pain: evidence for a three component structure.
    Mounce C; Keogh E; Eccleston C
    J Pain; 2010 Aug; 11(8):710-7. PubMed ID: 20015698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The identification of age-related differences in kinetic gait parameters using principal component analysis.
    Chester VL; Wrigley AT
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Feb; 23(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 18063458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.