BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

918 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26777092)

  • 1. Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM resin composite molar crowns.
    Shembish FA; Tong H; Kaizer M; Janal MN; Thompson VP; Opdam NJ; Zhang Y
    Dent Mater; 2016 Apr; 32(4):499-509. PubMed ID: 26777092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survival of resin infiltrated ceramics under influence of fatigue.
    Aboushelib MN; Elsafi MH
    Dent Mater; 2016 Apr; 32(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 26764178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture resistance of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated composite resin-based molar crowns.
    Harada A; Nakamura K; Kanno T; Inagaki R; Örtengren U; Niwano Y; Sasaki K; Egusa H
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2015 Apr; 123(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 25683749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Polymer infiltrated ceramic network structures for resistance to fatigue fracture and wear.
    El Zhawi H; Kaizer MR; Chughtai A; Moraes RR; Zhang Y
    Dent Mater; 2016 Nov; 32(11):1352-1361. PubMed ID: 27585486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fatigue resistance and microleakage of CAD/CAM ceramic and composite molar crowns.
    Kassem AS; Atta O; El-Mowafy O
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jan; 21(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 22008462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strength and fracture pattern of monolithic CAD/CAM-generated posterior crowns.
    Bindl A; Lüthy H; Mörmann WH
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 16040113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A preliminary evaluation of the structural integrity and fracture mode of minimally prepared resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns.
    Tsitrou EA; Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M; van Noort R
    J Dent; 2010 Jan; 38(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 19683378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Zellweger G; Büchler A; Zappini G
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 18433859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fatigue resistance of 2 different CAD/CAM glass-ceramic materials used for single-tooth implant crowns.
    Çavuşoğlu Y; Sahin E; Gürbüz R; Akça K
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 21881517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fatigue behavior and crack initiation of CAD/CAM resin composite molar crowns.
    Yamaguchi S; Kani R; Kawakami K; Tsuji M; Inoue S; Lee C; Kiba W; Imazato S
    Dent Mater; 2018 Oct; 34(10):1578-1584. PubMed ID: 30049596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars.
    Vianna ALSV; Prado CJD; Bicalho AA; Pereira RADS; Neves FDD; Soares CJ
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2018; 26():e20180004. PubMed ID: 30133672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture strength of minimally prepared all-ceramic CEREC crowns after simulating 5 years of service.
    Skouridou N; Pollington S; Rosentritt M; Tsitrou E
    Dent Mater; 2013 Jun; 29(6):e70-7. PubMed ID: 23618556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fatigue performance of adhesively cemented glass-, hybrid- and resin-ceramic materials for CAD/CAM monolithic restorations.
    Venturini AB; Prochnow C; Pereira GKR; Segala RD; Kleverlaan CJ; Valandro LF
    Dent Mater; 2019 Apr; 35(4):534-542. PubMed ID: 30686711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fatigue analysis of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing resin-based composite vs. lithium disilicate glass-ceramic.
    Ankyu S; Nakamura K; Harada A; Hong G; Kanno T; Niwano Y; Örtengren U; Egusa H
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2016 Aug; 124(4):387-95. PubMed ID: 27203408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
    Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fatigue survival and damage modes of lithium disilicate and resin nanoceramic crowns.
    Ferruzzi F; Ferrairo BM; Piras FF; Borges AFS; Rubo JH
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019 May; 27():e20180297. PubMed ID: 31166548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture resistance of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns cemented on solid abutments.
    Stona D; Burnett LH; Mota EG; Spohr AM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2015 Jul; 146(7):501-7. PubMed ID: 26113098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro study of fracture load and fracture pattern of ceramic crowns: a finite element and fractography analysis.
    Campos RE; Soares CJ; Quagliatto PS; Soares PV; de Oliveira OB; Santos-Filho PC; Salazar-Marocho SM
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 21843228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution.
    Dartora G; Rocha Pereira GK; Varella de Carvalho R; Zucuni CP; Valandro LF; Cesar PF; Caldas RA; Bacchi A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec; 100():103401. PubMed ID: 31445400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.