These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26777143)

  • 1. A comparative evaluation of five hazard screening tools.
    Panko JM; Hitchcock K; Fung M; Spencer PJ; Kingsbury T; Mason AM
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):139-154. PubMed ID: 26777143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An open framework for automated chemical hazard assessment based on GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals: A proof of concept.
    Wehage K; Chenhansa P; Schoenung JM
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):167-176. PubMed ID: 26887838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quantitative screening-level approach to incorporate chemical exposure and risk into alternative assessment evaluations.
    Arnold SM; Greggs B; Goyak KO; Landenberger BD; Mason AM; Howard B; Zaleski RT
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Nov; 13(6):1007-1022. PubMed ID: 28294522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The applicability of chemical alternatives assessment for engineered nanomaterials.
    Hjorth R; Hansen SF; Jacobs M; Tickner J; Ellenbecker M; Baun A
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):177-187. PubMed ID: 26887668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementation of the basic hazard index screening for health risks associated with simultaneous exposure to multiple chemicals using a standardized target organ and systems framework.
    Adams VH; McAtee MJ; Johnson MS
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Sep; 13(5):852-860. PubMed ID: 28135038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advancing alternatives analysis: The role of predictive toxicology in selecting safer chemical products and processes.
    Malloy T; Zaunbrecher V; Beryt E; Judson R; Tice R; Allard P; Blake A; Cote I; Godwin H; Heine L; Kerzic P; Kostal J; Marchant G; McPartland J; Moran K; Nel A; Ogunseitan O; Rossi M; Thayer K; Tickner J; Whittaker M; Zarker K
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Sep; 13(5):915-925. PubMed ID: 28247928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When Are Adverse Outcome Pathways and Associated Assays "Fit for Purpose" for Regulatory Decision-Making and Management of Chemicals?
    Coady K; Browne P; Embry M; Hill T; Leinala E; Steeger T; Maślankiewicz L; Hutchinson T
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Jul; 15(4):633-647. PubMed ID: 30908812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A risk-based, product-level approach for assuring aquatic environmental safety of cleaning products in the context of sustainability: The Environmental Safety Check (ESC) scheme of the A.I.S.E. Charter for Sustainable Cleaning.
    Pickup JA; Dewaele J; Furmanski NL; Kowalczyk A; Luijkx GC; Mathieu S; Stelter N
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):127-138. PubMed ID: 26891423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A tiered asthma hazard characterization and exposure assessment approach for evaluation of consumer product ingredients.
    Maier A; Vincent MJ; Parker A; Gadagbui BK; Jayjock M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Dec; 73(3):903-13. PubMed ID: 26416168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the reliability of ecotoxicological studies: An overview of current needs and approaches.
    Moermond C; Beasley A; Breton R; Junghans M; Laskowski R; Solomon K; Zahner H
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):640-651. PubMed ID: 27869364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporation of potential for multimedia exposure into chemical hazard scores for pollution prevention.
    Whaley DA; Meloy TP; Barrett SS; Bedillion EJ
    Drug Chem Toxicol; 1999 Feb; 22(1):241-73. PubMed ID: 10189582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of a modified GreenScreen tool to conduct a screening-level comparative hazard assessment of conventional silver and two forms of nanosilver.
    Sass J; Heine L; Hwang N
    Environ Health; 2016 Nov; 15(1):105. PubMed ID: 27825359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multicriteria Decision Analysis Characterization of Chemical Hazard Assessment Data Sources.
    He H; Malloy TF; Schoenung JM
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Nov; 15(6):895-908. PubMed ID: 31283083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aiding alternatives assessment with an uncertainty-tolerant hazard scoring method.
    Faludi J; Hoang T; Gorman P; Mulvihill M
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Nov; 182():111-125. PubMed ID: 27454102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advancing alternatives assessment for safer chemical substitution: A research and practice agenda.
    Tickner J; Jacobs M; Malloy T; Buck T; Stone A; Blake A; Edwards S
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Nov; 15(6):855-866. PubMed ID: 30117284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chemical assessment state of the science: Evaluation of 32 decision-support tools used to screen and prioritize chemicals.
    Gauthier AM; Fung M; Panko J; Kingsbury T; Perez AL; Hitchcock K; Ferracini T; Sahmel J; Banducci A; Jacobsen M; Abelmann A; Shay E
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Apr; 11(2):242-55. PubMed ID: 25377590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing Options for Deriving Chemical Ecotoxicity Hazard Values for the European Union Environmental Footprint, Part II.
    Saouter E; Wolff D; Biganzoli F; Versteeg D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Sep; 15(5):796-807. PubMed ID: 31115961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Qualitative approach to comparative exposure in alternatives assessment.
    Greggs W; Burns T; Egeghy P; Embry MR; Fantke P; Gaborek B; Heine L; Jolliet O; Lee C; Muir D; Plotzke K; Rinkevich J; Sunger N; Tanir JY; Whittaker M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Nov; 15(6):880-894. PubMed ID: 29917303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The challenge of predicting problematic chemicals using a decision analysis tool: Triclosan as a case study.
    Perez AL; Gauthier AM; Ferracini T; Cowan DM; Kingsbury T; Panko J
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):198-207. PubMed ID: 27006271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A critical review of frameworks used for evaluating reliability and relevance of (eco)toxicity data: Perspectives for an integrated eco-human decision-making framework.
    Roth N; Ciffroy P
    Environ Int; 2016 Oct; 95():16-29. PubMed ID: 27480485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.