200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26777209)
1. Monophasic and biphasic shock for transthoracic conversion of atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Inácio JF; da Rosa Mdos S; Shah J; Rosário J; Vissoci JR; Manica AL; Rodrigues CG
Resuscitation; 2016 Mar; 100():66-75. PubMed ID: 26777209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Transthoracic cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison of three different waveforms].
Santomauro M; Borrelli A; Ottaviano L; Costanzo A; Monteforte N; Duilio C; Chiariello M
Ital Heart J Suppl; 2004 Jan; 5(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 15253143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of rectilinear biphasic versus damped sine wave monophasic shocks.
Mittal S; Ayati S; Stein KM; Schwartzman D; Cavlovich D; Tchou PJ; Markowitz SM; Slotwiner DJ; Scheiner MA; Lerman BB
Circulation; 2000 Mar; 101(11):1282-7. PubMed ID: 10725288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.
Gurevitz OT; Ammash NM; Malouf JF; Chandrasekaran K; Rosales AG; Ballman KV; Hammill SC; White RD; Gersh BJ; Friedman PA
Am Heart J; 2005 Feb; 149(2):316-21. PubMed ID: 15846271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Impact of electrical shock waveform and paddle positions on efficacy of direct current cardioversion for atrial fibrillation].
Stanaitiene G; Babarskiene RM
Medicina (Kaunas); 2008; 44(9):665-72. PubMed ID: 18971603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Ambulatory electrocardioversion of atrial fibrillation by means of biphasic versus monophasic shock delivery. A prospective randomized study].
Neumann T; Erdogan A; Reiner C; Siemon G; Kurzidim K; Berkowitsch A; Kuniss M; Sperzel J; Hamm CW; Pitschner HF
Z Kardiol; 2004 May; 93(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 15160273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of monophasic and biphasic shocks for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
Scholten M; Szili-Torok T; Klootwijk P; Jordaens L
Heart; 2003 Sep; 89(9):1032-4. PubMed ID: 12923020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biphasic versus monophasic cardioversion in shock-resistant atrial fibrillation:
Khaykin Y; Newman D; Kowalewski M; Korley V; Dorian P
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Aug; 14(8):868-72. PubMed ID: 12890051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of biphasic vs monophasic waveform shocks.
Ricard P; Lévy S; Boccara G; Lakhal E; Bardy G
Europace; 2001 Apr; 3(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 11333061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform for conversion of atrial fibrillation.
Rho RW; Page RL
Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Sep; 7(3):290-1. PubMed ID: 14739730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective, randomized comparison of two biphasic waveforms for the efficacy and safety of transthoracic biphasic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
Alatawi F; Gurevitz O; White RD; Ammash NM; Malouf JF; Bruce CJ; Moon BS; Rosales AG; Hodge D; Hammill SC; Gersh BJ; Friedman PA
Heart Rhythm; 2005 Apr; 2(4):382-7. PubMed ID: 15851340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform for conversion of atrial fibrillation: the results of an international randomized, double-blind multicenter trial.
Page RL; Kerber RE; Russell JK; Trouton T; Waktare J; Gallik D; Olgin JE; Ricard P; Dalzell GW; Reddy R; Lazzara R; Lee K; Carlson M; Halperin B; Bardy GH;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2002 Jun; 39(12):1956-63. PubMed ID: 12084594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of rectilinear and truncated exponential biphasic waveforms in elective cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Deakin CD; Connelly S; Wharton R; Yuen HM
Resuscitation; 2013 Mar; 84(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 22842285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of biphasic and monophasic waveforms in epicardial atrial defibrillation.
Keane D; Boyd E; Anderson D; Robles A; Deverall P; Morris R; Jackson G; Sowton E
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Jul; 24(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 8006262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized controlled trial of efficacy and ST change following use of the Welch-Allyn MRL PIC biphasic waveform versus damped sine monophasic waveform for external DC cardioversion.
Ambler JJ; Deakin CD
Resuscitation; 2006 Nov; 71(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 16987583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Post-shock myocardial stunning: a prospective randomised double-blind comparison of monophasic and biphasic waveforms.
Deakin CD; Ambler JJ
Resuscitation; 2006 Mar; 68(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 16378672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monophasic versus biphasic waveform shocks for atrial fibrillation cardioversion in patients with concomitant amiodarone therapy.
Kawabata VS; Vianna CB; Moretti MA; Gonzalez MM; Ferreira JF; Timerman S; Cesar LA
Europace; 2007 Feb; 9(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 17272337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison between monophasic and biphasic defibrillation for the cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with and without heart failure.
Shelton RJ; Brown BD; Allinson A; Johnson T; Smales C; Jolly S; Cleland JG
Int J Cardiol; 2011 Mar; 147(3):405-8. PubMed ID: 19861229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Internal cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation using rectilinear biphasic waveform.
Mairesse GH; Raepers M; Legrand I; Baroud I; Deheneffe Y; Emonts M; Paquay JL; Mitri K
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2003 Dec; 9(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 14618059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of rectilinear biphasic waveform energy versus truncated exponential biphasic waveform energy for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
Kim ML; Kim SG; Park DS; Gross JN; Ferrick KJ; Palma EC; Fisher JD
Am J Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 94(11):1438-40. PubMed ID: 15566922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
