These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26777441)

  • 1. Analyzing Multivariate Repeated Measures Designs: A Comparison of Two Approximate Degrees of Freedom Procedures.
    Lix LM; Algina J; Keselman HJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2003 Oct; 38(4):403-31. PubMed ID: 26777441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing treatment effects in repeated measures designs: trimmed means and bootstrapping.
    Keselman HJ; Kowalchuk RK; Algina J; Lix LM; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2000 Nov; 53 ( Pt 2)():175-91. PubMed ID: 11109703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeated Measures Interaction Test with Aligned Ranks.
    Kowalchuk RK; Keselman HJ; Algina J
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2003 Oct; 38(4):433-61. PubMed ID: 26777442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robust tests for multivariate factorial designs under heteroscedasticity.
    Vallejo G; Ato M
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):471-89. PubMed ID: 21994181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modified Brown-Forsythe Procedure for Testing Interaction Effects in Split-Plot Designs.
    Vallejo G; Ato M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2006 Dec; 41(4):549-78. PubMed ID: 26794918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Power comparison of new tests to analyze repeated measures data].
    Livacic-Rojas P; Vallejo G; Fernández P
    Psicothema; 2007 Nov; 19(4):673-8. PubMed ID: 17959125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing Repeated Measures Hypotheses when Covariance Matrices are Heterogeneous: Revisiting the Robustness of the Welch-James Test.
    Algina J; Keselman HJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1997 Jul; 32(3):255-74. PubMed ID: 26761611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A robust approach for analyzing unbalanced factorial designs with fixed levels.
    Vallejo G; Ato M; Fernández MP
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):607-17. PubMed ID: 20479192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robust step-down tests for multivariate independent group designs.
    Lix LM; Fouladi RT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):245-65. PubMed ID: 17971269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robust tests for the multivariate Behrens-Fisher problem.
    Lix LM; Keselman HJ; Hinds AM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Feb; 77(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 15652635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Two Procedures for Analyzing Small Sets of Repeated Measures Data.
    Vallejo G; Livacic-Rojas P
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2005 Apr; 40(2):179-205. PubMed ID: 26760106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of non-normality on test statistics for one-way independent groups designs.
    Cribbie RA; Fiksenbaum L; Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 21426313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparison of Data Analysis Strategies for Testing Omnibus Effects in Higher-Order Repeated Measures Designs.
    Keselman HJ; Algina J; Kowalchuk RK
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2002 Jul; 37(3):331-57. PubMed ID: 26751292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robust alternatives to traditional analysis of variance: Welch W*, James J I*, James J II*, Brown-Forsythe BF*.
    Reed JF; Stark DB
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1988; 26(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 3383561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A practical method for analyzing factorial designs with heteroscedastic data.
    Vallejo G; Ato M; Fernández MP; Livacic-Rojas PE
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Jun; 102(3):643-56. PubMed ID: 18763432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A generally robust approach for testing hypotheses and setting confidence intervals for effect sizes.
    Keselman HJ; Algina J; Lix LM; Wilcox RR; Deering KN
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Jun; 13(2):110-29. PubMed ID: 18557681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An examination of the robustness of the empirical Bayes and other approaches for testing main and interaction effects in repeated measures designs.
    Keselman HJ; Kowalchuk RK; Boik RJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2000 May; 53 ( Pt 1)():51-67. PubMed ID: 10895522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the robustness of repeated measures analyses: the case of small sample sizes and nonnormal data.
    Oberfeld D; Franke T
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):792-812. PubMed ID: 23184532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tests for the analysis of variance of crossover designs with correlated errors.
    Bellavance F; Tardif S; Stephens MA
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):607-12. PubMed ID: 8672705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A SAS/IML program for implementing the modified Brown-Forsythe procedure in repeated measures designs.
    Vallejo G; Moris J; Conejo NM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Sep; 83(3):169-77. PubMed ID: 16934362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.