BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

517 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26777590)

  • 1. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System:: Substantial Discordance Between CT and MR for Imaging Classification of Hepatic Nodules.
    Zhang YD; Zhu FP; Xu X; Wang Q; Wu CJ; Liu XS; Shi HB
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 26777590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Classifying CT/MR findings in patients with suspicion of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of liver imaging reporting and data system and criteria-free Likert scale reporting models.
    Zhang YD; Zhu FP; Xu X; Wang Q; Wu CJ; Liu XS; Shi HB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 26119393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Discordance Between Computed Tomography and Gadoxetate-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Major Features.
    Chernyak V; Flusberg M; Law A; Kobi M; Paroder V; Rozenblit AM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(1):155-161. PubMed ID: 28806321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rate of observation and inter-observer agreement for LI-RADS major features at CT and MRI in 184 pathology proven hepatocellular carcinomas.
    Ehman EC; Behr SC; Umetsu SE; Fidelman N; Yeh BM; Ferrell LD; Hope TA
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 May; 41(5):963-9. PubMed ID: 27193793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Added Value of a Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Hepatocyte-phase Image to the LI-RADS System for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Chen N; Motosugi U; Morisaka H; Ichikawa S; Sano K; Ichikawa T; Matsuda M; Fujii H; Onishi H
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2016; 15(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 26104079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability, Validity, and Reader Acceptance of LI-RADS-An In-depth Analysis.
    Barth BK; Donati OF; Fischer MA; Ulbrich EJ; Karlo CA; Becker A; Seifert B; Reiner CS
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):1145-53. PubMed ID: 27174029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Can LI-RADS v2017 with gadoxetic-acid enhancement magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging improve diagnostic accuracy?
    Zhang T; Huang ZX; Wei Y; Jiang HY; Chen J; Liu XJ; Cao LK; Duan T; He XP; Xia CC; Song B
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Feb; 25(5):622-631. PubMed ID: 30774276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-aided diagnosis program for classifying the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma on MR images following liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS).
    Kim Y; Furlan A; Borhani AA; Bae KT
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Mar; 47(3):710-722. PubMed ID: 28556283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interobserver and intermodality agreement of standardized algorithms for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk patients: CEUS-LI-RADS versus MRI-LI-RADS.
    Schellhaas B; Hammon M; Strobel D; Pfeifer L; Kielisch C; Goertz RS; Cavallaro A; Janka R; Neurath MF; Uder M; Seuss H
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Oct; 28(10):4254-4264. PubMed ID: 29675659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast ultrasound LI-RADS LR-5 identifies hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis in a multicenter restropective study of 1,006 nodules.
    Terzi E; Iavarone M; Pompili M; Veronese L; Cabibbo G; Fraquelli M; Riccardi L; De Bonis L; Sangiovanni A; Leoni S; Zocco MA; Rossi S; Alessi N; Wilson SR; Piscaglia F;
    J Hepatol; 2018 Mar; 68(3):485-492. PubMed ID: 29133247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017.
    Seo N; Kim MS; Park MS; Choi JY; Do RKG; Han K; Kim MJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):261-271. PubMed ID: 31418085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing diagnostic imaging data using LI-RADS and the Likert scale in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Morad K; Moustafa AF; Refaat AM; AbdEllatif A; ElAzab MS
    Pol J Radiol; 2021; 86():e557-e563. PubMed ID: 34820032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS 2017: comparison with CT/MRI LI-RADS.
    Ding J; Long L; Zhang X; Chen C; Zhou H; Zhou Y; Wang Y; Jing X; Ye Z; Wang F
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):847-854. PubMed ID: 32803416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter-reader reliability of CT Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System according to imaging analysis methodology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kang JH; Choi SH; Lee JS; Kim KW; Kim SY; Lee SS; Byun JH
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):6856-6867. PubMed ID: 33713172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increased interreader agreement in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using an adapted LI-RADS algorithm.
    Becker AS; Barth BK; Marquez PH; Donati OF; Ulbrich EJ; Karlo C; Reiner CS; Fischer MA
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():33-40. PubMed ID: 28027763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the accuracy of AASLD and LI-RADS criteria for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC smaller than 3 cm.
    Ronot M; Fouque O; Esvan M; Lebigot J; Aubé C; Vilgrain V
    J Hepatol; 2018 Apr; 68(4):715-723. PubMed ID: 29274407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in Liver Imaging and Reporting Data System Categorization Between MRI and CT.
    Corwin MT; Fananapazir G; Jin M; Lamba R; Bashir MR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Feb; 206(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 26797357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: comparison between computed tomography and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nakao S; Tanabe M; Okada M; Furukawa M; Iida E; Miyoshi K; Matsunaga N; Ito K
    Jpn J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 37(9):651-659. PubMed ID: 31321619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does a combined CT and MRI protocol enhance the diagnostic efficacy of LI-RADS in the categorization of hepatic observations? A prospective comparative study.
    Basha MAA; AlAzzazy MZ; Ahmed AF; Yousef HY; Shehata SM; El Sammak DAEA; Fathy T; Obaya AA; Abdelbary EH
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2592-2603. PubMed ID: 29368164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Focal Liver Lesions Using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System.
    Wang JY; Feng SY; Yi AJ; Zhu D; Xu JW; Li J; Cui XW; Dietrich CF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 May; 46(5):1216-1223. PubMed ID: 32115307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.