171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26777790)
1. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the neonatal/infant Braden Q risk assessment scale.
de Lima EL; de Brito MJ; de Souza DM; Salomé GM; Ferreira LM
J Tissue Viability; 2016 Feb; 25(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 26777790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment Scale.
García-Molina P; Balaguer López E; Verdú J; Nolasco A; García Fernández FP
J Nurs Manag; 2018 Sep; 26(6):744-756. PubMed ID: 29656490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SIRA+P: Development and Testing.
Foster KL; Bergerhofer LD; Smith JB; Fix MM; Olney A; Sherman A
J Pediatr Nurs; 2017; 34():65-71. PubMed ID: 28094094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
Kottner J; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting pressure ulcer risk in pediatric patients: the Braden Q Scale.
Curley MA; Razmus IS; Roberts KE; Wypij D
Nurs Res; 2003; 52(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 12552172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the performance of the Braden Q and the Glamorgan paediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment scales in general and intensive care paediatric and neonatal units.
Willock J; Habiballah L; Long D; Palmer K; Anthony D
J Tissue Viability; 2016 May; 25(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 27020863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Braden scale (ALB) for assessing pressure ulcer risk in hospital patients: A validity and reliability study.
Chen HL; Cao YJ; Zhang W; Wang J; Huai BS
Appl Nurs Res; 2017 Feb; 33():169-174. PubMed ID: 28096013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care: comparison of inter-rater reliability of the COMHON (Conscious level, Mobility, Haemodynamics, Oxygenation, Nutrition) Index with three scales.
Fulbrook P; Anderson A
J Adv Nurs; 2016 Mar; 72(3):680-92. PubMed ID: 26462998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Braden Scale cannot be used alone for assessing pressure ulcer risk in surgical patients: a meta-analysis.
He W; Liu P; Chen HL
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2012 Feb; 58(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 22316631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Meta-analysis to Evaluate the Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment in Long-term Care.
Chen HL; Shen WQ; Liu P
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Sep; 62(9):20-8. PubMed ID: 27668477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adopting Braden Q in the NICU to Identify Neonates at Risk of Developing Pressure Injuries.
Wacek M; Ecklund M
Neonatal Netw; 2018 Sep; 37(5):319-323. PubMed ID: 30567814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of Web-based Braden Scale training on the reliability and precision of Braden Scale pressure ulcer risk assessments.
Magnan MA; Maklebust J
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(2):199-208; discussion 209-12. PubMed ID: 18344795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.
Kottner J; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The 2003 national pediatric pressure ulcer and skin breakdown prevalence survey: a multisite study.
McLane KM; Bookout K; McCord S; McCain J; Jefferson LS
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2004; 31(4):168-78. PubMed ID: 15851858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychometric properties of the Braden scale to assess pressure injury risk in intensive care: A systematic review.
Mehicic A; Burston A; Fulbrook P
Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2024 Aug; 83():103686. PubMed ID: 38518454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Body Dysmorphic Symptoms Scale for patients seeking esthetic surgery: cross-cultural validation study.
Ramos TD; Brito MJ; Piccolo MS; Rosella MF; Sabino M; Ferreira LM
Sao Paulo Med J; 2016; 134(6):480-490. PubMed ID: 28076636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The prognostic ability of early Braden Q Scores in critically ill children.
Tume LN; Siner S; Scott E; Lane S
Nurs Crit Care; 2014 Mar; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 24529107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inter-rater reliability of three most commonly used pressure ulcer risk assessment scales in clinical practice.
Wang LH; Chen HL; Yan HY; Gao JH; Wang F; Ming Y; Lu L; Ding JJ
Int Wound J; 2015 Oct; 12(5):590-4. PubMed ID: 25224688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
