260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26778318)
1. Using genomics to enhance selection of novel traits in North American dairy cattle.
Chesnais JP; Cooper TA; Wiggans GR; Sargolzaei M; Pryce JE; Miglior F
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2413-2427. PubMed ID: 26778318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle.
Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3443-59. PubMed ID: 25771052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of breeding values for feed intake and feed efficiency traits in dairy cattle: When dry matter intake recordings are sparse under different scenarios.
Negussie E; Mehtiö T; Mäntysaari P; Løvendahl P; Mäntysaari EA; Lidauer MH
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7248-7262. PubMed ID: 31155258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of using cow genomic information on accuracy and bias of genomic breeding values in a simulated Holstein dairy cattle population.
Dehnavi E; Mahyari SA; Schenkel FS; Sargolzaei M
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5166-5176. PubMed ID: 29605309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic selection strategies in a small dairy cattle population evaluated for genetic gain and profit.
Thomasen JR; Egger-Danner C; Willam A; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sørensen AC
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(1):458-70. PubMed ID: 24239076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value of sharing cow reference population between countries on reliability of genomic prediction for milk yield traits.
Haile-Mariam M; MacLeod IM; Bolormaa S; Schrooten C; O'Connor E; de Jong G; Daetwyler HD; Pryce JE
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1711-1728. PubMed ID: 31864746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of genotyped cows in the reference population on the genomic evaluation of Holstein cattle.
Uemoto Y; Osawa T; Saburi J
Animal; 2017 Mar; 11(3):382-393. PubMed ID: 27515004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving accuracy of bulls' predicted genomic breeding values for fertility using daughters' milk progesterone profiles.
Tenghe AMM; Bouwman AC; Berglund B; de Koning DJ; Veerkamp RF
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5177-5193. PubMed ID: 29525306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle.
Calus MP; de Haas Y; Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF
Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 23031684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic prediction of milk-production traits and somatic cell score using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor with random regression test-day model in Thai dairy cattle.
Buaban S; Prempree S; Sumreddee P; Duangjinda M; Masuda Y
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Dec; 104(12):12713-12723. PubMed ID: 34538484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sharing reference data and including cows in the reference population improve genomic predictions in Danish Jersey.
Su G; Ma P; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Wiggans G; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS
Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1067-75. PubMed ID: 26330119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic selection for feed efficiency in dairy cattle.
Pryce JE; Wales WJ; de Haas Y; Veerkamp RF; Hayes BJ
Animal; 2014 Jan; 8(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 24128704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic prediction of residual feed intake in US Holstein dairy cattle.
Li B; VanRaden PM; Guduk E; O'Connell JR; Null DJ; Connor EE; VandeHaar MJ; Tempelman RJ; Weigel KA; Cole JB
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Mar; 103(3):2477-2486. PubMed ID: 31954583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic prediction of dry matter intake in dairy cattle from an international data set consisting of research herds in Europe, North America, and Australasia.
de Haas Y; Pryce JE; Calus MP; Wall E; Berry DP; Løvendahl P; Krattenmacher N; Miglior F; Weigel K; Spurlock D; Macdonald KA; Hulsegge B; Veerkamp RF
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Sep; 98(9):6522-34. PubMed ID: 26188577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adding cows to the reference population makes a small dairy population competitive.
Thomasen JR; Sørensen AC; Lund MS; Guldbrandtsen B
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5822-32. PubMed ID: 24996280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short communication: Validation of genomic breeding value predictions for feed intake and feed efficiency traits.
Pryce JE; Gonzalez-Recio O; Thornhill JB; Marett LC; Wales WJ; Coffey MP; de Haas Y; Veerkamp RF; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(1):537-42. PubMed ID: 24239085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.
Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of genomic predictions in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle.
Boison SA; Utsunomiya ATH; Santos DJA; Neves HHR; Carvalheiro R; Mészáros G; Utsunomiya YT; do Carmo AS; Verneque RS; Machado MA; Panetto JCC; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MVGB
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jul; 100(7):5479-5490. PubMed ID: 28527809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.
Seno LO; Guidolin DGF; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Nascimento GBD; Silva TBRD; Oliveira HN; Munari DP
J Dairy Res; 2018 May; 85(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29785919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
