These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26778545)

  • 21. The effect of notch filtering on the waveform of the newborn auditory brainstem response.
    Lightfoot G; Ferm I; Hall A; Evans K
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):629-32. PubMed ID: 24673661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Auditory Middle-Latency Responses From Two Deconvolution Methods at 40 Hz.
    Tan XD; Peng X; Zhan CA; Wang T
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Jun; 63(6):1157-66. PubMed ID: 26441440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Enhancement of auditory-evoked potentials in musicians reflects an influence of expertise but not selective attention.
    Baumann S; Meyer M; Jäncke L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2238-49. PubMed ID: 18457513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Application of simultaneous auditory evoked potentials and functional magnetic resonance recordings for examination of central auditory system--preliminary results].
    Milner R; Rusiniak M; Wolak T; Piatkowska-Janko E; Naumczyk P; Bogorodzki P; Senderski A; Ganc M; Skarzyński H
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2011; 65(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 21916216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Diagnosis of auditory threshold with frequency-specific recording of auditory evoked potentials: personal results and methodological aspects].
    Schönweiler R; Ptok M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Sep; 74(9):531-8. PubMed ID: 7495433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A simulation study assessing the efficiency of deriving evoked responses using high stimulus rate.
    Wang T; Su YY; Shen Q; Ma J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():5033-6. PubMed ID: 19163847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Optimal estimation of temporal non-stationary signals by using simulated annealing: application to brainstem auditory evoked potentials].
    Naĭt-Ali A; Siarri P
    Med Tekh; 2003; (3):42-6. PubMed ID: 12872645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Auditory evoked field at threshold.
    Lütkenhöner B; Klein JS
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):188-200. PubMed ID: 17434696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sorted averaging improves quality of auditory steady-state responses.
    Rahne T; Verhey JL; Mühler R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 May; 216(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 23603663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Simultaneous acquisition of 80 Hz ASSRs and ABRs from quasi ASSRs for threshold estimation.
    Lachowska M; Bohórquez J; Ozdamar O
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):660-71. PubMed ID: 22568993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Auditory brainstem response recording to multiple interleaved broadband chirps.
    Cebulla M; Stürzebecher E; Don M; Müller-Mazzotta J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):466-79. PubMed ID: 22343544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Two-source interference as the major reason for auditory-threshold estimation error based on DPOAE input-output functions in normal-hearing subjects.
    Dalhoff E; Turcanu D; Vetešník A; Gummer AW
    Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():67-82. PubMed ID: 23268357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The progress in the study on slow vertex response].
    Liu H; Fan LH; Yang XP; Zhou XR; Dong DA; Wan L; Zhu GY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Apr; 26(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 20653140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Steady-state analysis of auditory evoked potentials over a wide range of stimulus repetition rates: profile in adults.
    Tlumak AI; Durrant JD; Delgado RE; Boston JR
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):448-58. PubMed ID: 21434788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Further comparisons of ABR response amplitudes, test time, and estimation of hearing threshold using frequency-specific chirp and tone pip stimuli in newborns: Findings at 0.5 and 2 kHz.
    Ferm I; Lightfoot G
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):745-50. PubMed ID: 26121565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sorted averaging--application to auditory event-related responses.
    Rahne T; von Specht H; Mühler R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Jul; 172(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 18499265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of low-frequency hearing with narrow-band chirp-evoked 40-Hz sinusoidal auditory steady-state response.
    Wilson US; Kaf WA; Danesh AA; Lichtenhan JT
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 26795555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Simultaneous recording of fast and slow auditory evoked potentials (slow-fast-simultaneous-ERA, SFS-ERA).
    Lehnhardt E; Battmer RD
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1979; 222(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 435167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Post-processing of auditory steady-state responses to correct spectral leakage.
    Felix LB; de Sá AM; Mendes EM; Moraes MF
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Jun; 181(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 19394362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of stimulus choice on cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP): consideration of speech segment positioning within naturally produced speech.
    Easwar V; Glista D; Purcell DW; Scollie SD
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 51(12):926-31. PubMed ID: 22916693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.