These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26779046)

  • 1. Beyond Gender Stereotypes in Language Comprehension: Self Sex-Role Descriptions Affect the Brain's Potentials Associated with Agreement Processing.
    Canal P; Garnham A; Oakhill J
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1953. PubMed ID: 26779046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes.
    Osterhout L; Bersick M; McLaughlin J
    Mem Cognit; 1997 May; 25(3):273-85. PubMed ID: 9184479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-related differences in understanding pronominal reference in sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation.
    Lee CL; Lai CH
    Psychol Aging; 2024 May; 39(3):275-287. PubMed ID: 37650796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The electrophysiological underpinnings of processing gender stereotypes in language.
    Siyanova-Chanturia A; Pesciarelli F; Cacciari C
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e48712. PubMed ID: 23226494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When "He" Can Also Be "She": An ERP Study of Reflexive Pronoun Resolution in Written Mandarin Chinese.
    Su JJ; Molinaro N; Gillon-Dowens M; Tsai PS; Wu DH; Carreiras M
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():151. PubMed ID: 26903939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction.
    Gunter TC; Friederici AD; Schriefers H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000 Jul; 12(4):556-68. PubMed ID: 10936910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of grammatical gender on the processing of occupational role names in Slovene: An event-related potential study.
    Mikić Ljubi J; Matkovič A; Bon J; Kanjuo Mrčela A
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1010708. PubMed ID: 36600722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Agreement attraction during comprehension of grammatical sentences: ERP evidence from ellipsis.
    Martin AE; Nieuwland MS; Carreiras M
    Brain Lang; 2014 Aug; 135():42-51. PubMed ID: 24911918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Morphosyntax can modulate the N400 component: event related potentials to gender-marked post-nominal adjectives.
    Guajardo LF; Wicha NY
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 91():262-72. PubMed ID: 24462934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When Proactivity Fails: An Electrophysiological Study of Establishing Reference in Schizophrenia.
    Kuperberg GR; Ditman T; Choi Perrachione A
    Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging; 2018 Jan; 3(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 29397083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in the processing of referential dependencies: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Fiorentino R; Covey L; Gabriele A
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Apr; 673():79-84. PubMed ID: 29444445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stereotypes override grammar: Social knowledge in sentence comprehension.
    Molinaro N; Su JJ; Carreiras M
    Brain Lang; 2016; 155-156():36-43. PubMed ID: 27108245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrophysiological estimates of biological and syntactic gender violation during pronoun processing.
    Schmitt BM; Lamers M; Münte TF
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 14(3):333-46. PubMed ID: 12421657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring the nature of the gender-congruency effect: implicit gender activation and social bias.
    Casado A; Sá-Leite AR; Pesciarelli F; Paolieri D
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1160836. PubMed ID: 37287785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are New Gender-Neutral Pronouns Difficult to Process in Reading? The Case of
    Vergoossen HP; Pärnamets P; Renström EA; Gustafsson Sendén M
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():574356. PubMed ID: 33244303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is animacy special? ERP correlates of semantic violations and animacy violations in sentence processing.
    Szewczyk JM; Schriefers H
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1368():208-21. PubMed ID: 21029726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brain potentials reveal differential processing of masculine and feminine grammatical gender in native Spanish speakers.
    Beatty-Martínez AL; Bruni MR; Bajo MT; Dussias PE
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Mar; 58(3):e13737. PubMed ID: 33263933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gender electrified: ERP evidence on the syntactic nature of gender processing.
    Hagoort P; Brown CM
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1999 Nov; 28(6):715-28. PubMed ID: 10510866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes Over Time in the Comprehension of He and They as Epicene Pronouns.
    Noll J; Lowry M; Bryant J
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Oct; 47(5):1057-1068. PubMed ID: 29549477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.