These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26779065)

  • 1. Can Chunk Size Differences Explain Developmental Changes in Lexical Learning?
    Smalle EH; Bogaerts L; Simonis M; Duyck W; Page MP; Edwards MG; Szmalec A
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1925. PubMed ID: 26779065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Grouping in working memory guides chunk formation in long-term memory: Evidence from the Hebb effect.
    Musfeld P; Dutli J; Oberauer K; Bartsch LM
    Cognition; 2024 Jul; 248():105795. PubMed ID: 38669793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hebb repetition effects for non-verbal visual sequences: determinants of sequence acquisition.
    Johnson AJ; Dygacz A; Miles C
    Memory; 2017 Oct; 25(9):1279-1293. PubMed ID: 28276975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why computational models are better than verbal theories: the case of nonword repetition.
    Jones G; Gobet F; Freudenthal D; Watson SE; Pine JM
    Dev Sci; 2014 Mar; 17(2):298-310. PubMed ID: 24238080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How does chunking help working memory?
    Thalmann M; Souza AS; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):37-55. PubMed ID: 29698045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Hebb repetition effect as a laboratory analogue of novel word learning.
    Szmalec A; Duyck W; Vandierendonck A; Mata AB; Page MP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Mar; 62(3):435-43. PubMed ID: 18785073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chunking away task-switch costs: a test of the chunk-point hypothesis.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):884-9. PubMed ID: 25214458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How Do We Segment Text? Two-Stage Chunking Operation in Reading.
    Yang 杨金骉 J; Cai 蔡清 Q; Tian 田兴 X
    eNeuro; 2020; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 32393584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The reliability of Hebb repetition learning and its association with language and reading in adolescents with intellectual disabilities.
    Henry LA; Messer DJ; Poloczek S; Dennan R; Mattiauda E; Danielsson H
    Cortex; 2024 May; 177():253-267. PubMed ID: 38878338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hebb repetition effects in complex and simple span tasks are based on the same learning mechanism.
    Araya C; Oberauer K; Saito S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 May; 50(5):759-774. PubMed ID: 37883053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linking memory and language: Evidence for a serial-order learning impairment in dyslexia.
    Bogaerts L; Szmalec A; Hachmann WM; Page MP; Duyck W
    Res Dev Disabil; 2015; 43-44():106-22. PubMed ID: 26164302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ERP responses to lexical-semantic processing in typically developing toddlers, in adults, and in toddlers at risk for language and learning impairment.
    Cantiani C; Riva V; Piazza C; Melesi G; Mornati G; Bettoni R; Marino C; Molteni M
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Aug; 103():115-130. PubMed ID: 28669897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determining the developmental requirements for hebb repetition learning in young children: Grouping, short-term memory, and their interaction.
    Yanaoka K; Nakayama M; Jarrold C; Saito S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):573-590. PubMed ID: 29999397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Children retain implicitly learned phonological sequences better than adults: a longitudinal study.
    Smalle EHM; Page MPA; Duyck W; Edwards M; Szmalec A
    Dev Sci; 2018 Sep; 21(5):e12634. PubMed ID: 29250874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistically based chunking of nonadjacent dependencies.
    Isbilen ES; Frost RLA; Monaghan P; Christiansen MH
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Nov; 151(11):2623-2640. PubMed ID: 35467930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-parametric Algorithm to Isolate Chunks in Response Sequences.
    Alamia A; Solopchuk O; Olivier E; Zenon A
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2016; 10():177. PubMed ID: 27708565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chunk boundaries disrupt dependency processing in an AG: Reconciling incremental processing and discrete sampling.
    Lo CW; Meyer L
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0305333. PubMed ID: 38889141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Realizing the Now-or-Never bottleneck and Chunk-and-Pass processing with Item-Order-Rank working memories and masking field chunking networks.
    Grossberg S
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e75. PubMed ID: 27561607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Hebb repetition effect as a laboratory analogue of language acquisition: Learning three lists at no cost.
    Saint-Aubin J; Guérard K
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2018 Mar; 72(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 28726445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Developmental origins of recoding and decoding in memory.
    Kibbe MM; Feigenson L
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Dec; 75():55-79. PubMed ID: 25195153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.