135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26781155)
1. Morphology evaluation of nonmass enhancement on breast MRI: Effect of a three-step interpretation model for readers' performances and biopsy recommendations.
Shimauchi A; Ota H; Machida Y; Yoshida T; Satani N; Mori N; Takase K; Tozaki M
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Feb; 85(2):480-8. PubMed ID: 26781155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver variability and likelihood of malignancy for fifth edition BI-RADS MRI descriptors in non-mass breast lesions.
Lunkiewicz M; Forte S; Freiwald B; Singer G; Leo C; Kubik-Huch RA
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 31392476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of BI-RADS-MRI descriptors for differentiation between mucinous carcinoma and fibroadenoma.
Igarashi T; Ashida H; Morikawa K; Motohashi K; Fukuda K
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1092-8. PubMed ID: 27161057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revisiting Nonmass Enhancement in Breast MRI: Analysis of Outcomes and Follow-Up Using the Updated BI-RADS Atlas.
Chikarmane SA; Michaels AY; Giess CS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1178-1184. PubMed ID: 28834447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The MRI characteristics of non-mass enhancement lesions of the breast: associations with malignancy.
Aydin H
Br J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 92(1096):20180464. PubMed ID: 30673299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Grading system to categorize breast MRI using BI-RADS 5th edition: a statistical study of non-mass enhancement descriptors in terms of probability of malignancy.
Asada T; Yamada T; Kanemaki Y; Fujiwara K; Okamoto S; Nakajima Y
Jpn J Radiol; 2018 Mar; 36(3):200-208. PubMed ID: 29285740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interobserver Variability Between Breast Imagers Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS MRI Lexicon.
Grimm LJ; Anderson AL; Baker JA; Johnson KS; Walsh R; Yoon SC; Ghate SV
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):1120-4. PubMed ID: 25905951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) lexicon for breast MRI: interobserver variability in the description and assignment of BI-RADS category.
El Khoury M; Lalonde L; David J; Labelle M; Mesurolle B; Trop I
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 25454100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two Distinct Types of Linear Distribution in Nonmass Enhancement at Breast MR Imaging: Difference in Positive Predictive Value between Linear and Branching Patterns.
Machida Y; Tozaki M; Shimauchi A; Yoshida T
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):686-94. PubMed ID: 25875971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study.
Baltzer PA; Benndorf M; Dietzel M; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1658-63. PubMed ID: 20489110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement.
Gutierrez RL; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Kurland BF; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):994-1000. PubMed ID: 19770321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast Nonmass Enhancement Detected with MRI: Uility and Lesion Characterization with Second-Look Ultrasonography.
Hsu HH; Chang TH; Chou YC; Peng YJ; Ko KH; Chang WC; Lin YP; Hsu GC; Yu JC
Breast J; 2015; 21(6):579-87. PubMed ID: 26390913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Discriminative Factors of Malignancy of Ipsilateral Nonmass Enhancement in Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer on Initial Staging Breast MRI.
Jirarayapong J; Chikarmane SA; Portnow LH; Farah S; Gombos EC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 May; 59(5):1725-1739. PubMed ID: 37534882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lesion type and reader experience affect the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI: a multiple reader ROC study.
Baltzer PAT; Kaiser WA; Dietzel M
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 25466772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast masses: computer-aided diagnosis with serial mammograms.
Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Blane C; Petrick N; Bailey J; Klein K; Foster M; Patterson SK; Adler D; Nees AV; Shen J
Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):343-56. PubMed ID: 16801362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists.
Neuschler EI; Butler R; Young CA; Barke LD; Bertrand ML; Böhm-Vélez M; Destounis S; Donlan P; Grobmyer SR; Katzen J; Kist KA; Lavin PT; Makariou EV; Parris TM; Schilling KJ; Tucker FL; Dogan BE
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 29178816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clumped vs non-clumped internal enhancement patterns in linear non-mass enhancement on breast MRI.
Chen ST; Covelli J; Okamoto S; Daniel BL; DeMartini WB; Ikeda DM
Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201166. PubMed ID: 33332980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI.
Sakamoto N; Tozaki M; Higa K; Tsunoda Y; Ogawa T; Abe S; Ozaki S; Sakamoto M; Tsuruhara T; Kawano N; Suzuki T; Yamashiro N; Fukuma E
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 18224381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvement in radiologists' characterization of malignant and benign breast masses on serial mammograms with computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study.
Hadjiiski L; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Blane C; Paramagul C; Petrick N; Bailey J; Klein K; Foster M; Patterson S; Adler D; Nees A; Shen J
Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 15317954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Value of Lesion Size as an Adjunct to the BI-RADS-MRI 2013 Descriptors in the Diagnosis of Solitary Breast Masses.
Kawai M; Kataoka M; Kanao S; Iima M; Onishi N; Ohashi A; Sakaguchi R; Toi M; Togashi K
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2018 Jul; 17(3):203-210. PubMed ID: 29213007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
