121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26781646)
1. Review: How to improve genomic predictions in small dairy cattle populations.
Lund MS; van den Berg I; Ma P; Brøndum RF; Su G
Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1042-9. PubMed ID: 26781646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Review: Opportunities and challenges for small populations of dairy cattle in the era of genomics.
Schöpke K; Swalve HH
Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1050-60. PubMed ID: 26957010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sharing reference data and including cows in the reference population improve genomic predictions in Danish Jersey.
Su G; Ma P; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Wiggans G; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS
Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1067-75. PubMed ID: 26330119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adding cows to the reference population makes a small dairy population competitive.
Thomasen JR; Sørensen AC; Lund MS; Guldbrandtsen B
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5822-32. PubMed ID: 24996280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.
Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomic selection strategies in a small dairy cattle population evaluated for genetic gain and profit.
Thomasen JR; Egger-Danner C; Willam A; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sørensen AC
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(1):458-70. PubMed ID: 24239076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficient genomic prediction based on whole-genome sequence data using split-and-merge Bayesian variable selection.
Calus MP; Bouwman AC; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):49. PubMed ID: 27357580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Practical implications for genetic modeling in the genomics era.
VanRaden PM
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2405-2412. PubMed ID: 26778313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations.
Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1216-24. PubMed ID: 23217224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using genomics to enhance selection of novel traits in North American dairy cattle.
Chesnais JP; Cooper TA; Wiggans GR; Sargolzaei M; Pryce JE; Miglior F
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2413-2427. PubMed ID: 26778318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for meat tenderness in Polled Nellore cattle.
Magnabosco CU; Lopes FB; Fragoso RC; Eifert EC; Valente BD; Rosa GJ; Sainz RD
J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):2752-60. PubMed ID: 27482662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian single-step genomic evaluations combining local and foreign information in Walloon Holsteins.
Colinet FG; Vandenplas J; Vanderick S; Hammami H; Mota RR; Gillon A; Hubin X; Bertozzi C; Gengler N
Animal; 2018 May; 12(5):898-905. PubMed ID: 29032781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Including different groups of genotyped females for genomic prediction in a Nordic Jersey population.
Gao H; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G; Byskov K; Jensen J
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9051-9. PubMed ID: 26433419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Semi-supervised learning for genomic prediction of novel traits with small reference populations: an application to residual feed intake in dairy cattle.
Yao C; Zhu X; Weigel KA
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):84. PubMed ID: 27821057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combining cow and bull reference populations to increase accuracy of genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies.
Calus MP; de Haas Y; Veerkamp RF
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Oct; 96(10):6703-15. PubMed ID: 23891299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
