These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26781967)

  • 1. Monte Carlo Tests of the Accuracy of Cluster Analysis Algorithms: A Comparison of Hierarchical and Nonhierarchical Methods.
    Scheibler D; Schneider W
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1985 Jul; 20(3):283-304. PubMed ID: 26781967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mixture Model Tests Of Hierarchical Clustering Algorithms: The Problem Of Classifying Everybody.
    Edelbrock C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1979 Jul; 14(3):367-84. PubMed ID: 26821856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hierarchical Cluster Analysis Using Intraclass Correlations: A Mixture Model Study.
    Edelbrock C; McLaughlin B
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1980 Jul; 15(3):299-318. PubMed ID: 26794184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of similarity coefficients for clustering and compound selection.
    Haranczyk M; Holliday J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):498-508. PubMed ID: 18293953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
    Ali I; Ahmad S
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Weighted rank aggregation of cluster validation measures: a Monte Carlo cross-entropy approach.
    Pihur V; Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):1607-15. PubMed ID: 17483500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose calculation accuracy of the Monte Carlo algorithm for CyberKnife compared with other commercially available dose calculation algorithms.
    Sharma S; Ott J; Williams J; Dickow D
    Med Dosim; 2011; 36(4):347-50. PubMed ID: 21144731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effects of Within-group Covariance Structure on Recovery in Cluster Analysis: I. The Bivariate Case.
    Donoghue JR
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1995 Apr; 30(2):227-54. PubMed ID: 26801301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Review Of Monte Carlo Tests Of Cluster Analysis.
    Milligan GW
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1981 Jul; 16(3):379-407. PubMed ID: 26815599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
    Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A measure of DNA sequence similarity by Fourier Transform with applications on hierarchical clustering.
    Yin C; Chen Y; Yau SS
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Oct; 359():18-28. PubMed ID: 24911780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting latent taxa: Monte Carlo comparison of taxometric, mixture model, and clustering procedures.
    Cleland CM; Rothschild L; Haslam N
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Aug; 87(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 11026388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cluster analysis in family psychology research.
    Henry DB; Tolan PH; Gorman-Smith D
    J Fam Psychol; 2005 Mar; 19(1):121-32. PubMed ID: 15796658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
    Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
    Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation and comparison of gene clustering methods in microarray analysis.
    Thalamuthu A; Mukhopadhyay I; Zheng X; Tseng GC
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2405-12. PubMed ID: 16882653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clustering of gene expression data: performance and similarity analysis.
    Yin L; Huang CH; Ni J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 7 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S19. PubMed ID: 17217511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clustering: a neural network approach.
    Du KL
    Neural Netw; 2010 Jan; 23(1):89-107. PubMed ID: 19758784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AClAP, Autonomous hierarchical agglomerative Cluster Analysis based protocol to partition conformational datasets.
    Bottegoni G; Rocchia W; Recanatini M; Cavalli A
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e58-65. PubMed ID: 16873522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Universality of the Ising and the S=1 model on Archimedean lattices: a Monte Carlo determination.
    Malakis A; Gulpinar G; Karaaslan Y; Papakonstantinou T; Aslan G
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Mar; 85(3 Pt 1):031146. PubMed ID: 22587077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of smoothing algorithms in Monte Carlo dose calculations of cyberknife treatment plans: a lung phantom study.
    Sudahar H; Gopalakrishna Kurup PG; Murali V; Velmurugan J
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2012; 8(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 23174716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.