156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26782154)
1. Approach to intensely enhancing neck nodes.
Karandikar A; Gummalla KM; Loke SC; Goh J; Tan TY
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2016; 22(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 26782154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of cervical lymph nodes in head and neck cancer with CT and MRI: tips, traps, and a systematic approach.
Hoang JK; Vanka J; Ludwig BJ; Glastonbury CM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jan; 200(1):W17-25. PubMed ID: 23255768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical lymph node evaluation and diagnosis.
Bryson TC; Shah GV; Srinivasan A; Mukherji SK
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2012 Dec; 45(6):1363-83. PubMed ID: 23153753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computed tomography in the management of cervical lymph node pathology.
Pan WR; Suami H; Rozen WM; Taylor GI
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008 Oct; 61(10):1244-5. PubMed ID: 18585114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Computerized tomography diagnosis of cervical node metastasis in head and neck cancers].
Wang W; Luo J; Qiu W; Sun D
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1995 Jan; 30(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 7789237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The association of lymph node volume with cervical metastatic lesions in head and neck cancer patients.
Liang MT; Chen CC; Wang CP; Wang CC; Lin WD; Liu SA
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jun; 266(6):883-7. PubMed ID: 18815802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computed tomography of neck lymph nodes involved with malignant lymphoma: comparison with ultrasound.
Sakai F; Sone S; Kiyono K; Maruyama A; Oguchi M; Kawai T; Imai S; Izuno I; Shikama N; Takei K
Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):203-8. PubMed ID: 1823393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Segmentation of neck lymph nodes in CT datasets with stable 3D mass-spring models segmentation of neck lymph nodes.
Dornheim J; Seim H; Preim B; Hertel I; Strauss G
Acad Radiol; 2007 Nov; 14(11):1389-99. PubMed ID: 17964462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [CT scanning of the cervical lymph node metastases: compared with histologic sections].
Xu W; Liu D; Lu Z
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Mar; 12(3):99-102. PubMed ID: 11189141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Grey-scale sonography in assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: review of sonographic appearances and features that may help a beginner.
Ahuja A; Ying M
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Oct; 38(5):451-9. PubMed ID: 11010773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of Computerized Tomography density patterns of lymph nodes with treatment results and outcome in head and neck cancer patients treated by 2 different chemoradiotherapy schedules.
Jaju S; Gupta SK; Pandey S; Singh V
J Cancer Res Ther; 2014; 10(2):284-93. PubMed ID: 25022379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Computed tomography of the soft tissue of the neck. Lymph node metastases and their differential diagnosis].
Lenz M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):2-15. PubMed ID: 2018802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The predictive value of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography for sentinel lymph node localization in head and neck cutaneous malignancy.
Remenschneider AK; Dilger AE; Wang Y; Palmer EL; Scott JA; Emerick KS
Laryngoscope; 2015 Apr; 125(4):877-82. PubMed ID: 25388656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential diagnosis of small round cervical lymph nodes: comparison of power Doppler US with contrast-enhanced CT and pathologic results.
Sakaguchi T; Yamashita Y; Katahira K; Nishimura R; Baba Y; Arakawa A; Takahashi M; Yumoto E; Shinohara M
Radiat Med; 2001; 19(3):119-25. PubMed ID: 11467378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Ultrasound evaluation of characteristics of cervical lymph nodes with special reference to color Doppler ultrasound. A contribution to differentiating reactive from metastatic lymph node involvement in the neck].
Issing PR; Kettling T; Kempf HG; Heermann R; Lenarz T
Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Oct; 78(10):566-72. PubMed ID: 10595342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of multiple time point dynamic positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with oral/head and neck cancer does not predictably identify metastatic cervical lymph nodes.
Carlson ER; Schaefferkoetter J; Townsend D; McCoy JM; Campbell PD; Long M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 71(1):162-77. PubMed ID: 22742956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast enhancement in mediastinal and cervical lymph nodes.
Shapeero LG; Blank N; Young SW
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1983 Apr; 7(2):242-4. PubMed ID: 6833554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modern imaging lymph node staging of the head and neck region.
Krestan C; Herneth AM; Formanek M; Czerny C
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 16687230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nodal imaging in the neck: recent advances in US, CT and MR imaging of metastatic nodes.
Nakamura T; Sumi M
Eur Radiol; 2007 May; 17(5):1235-41. PubMed ID: 17252236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FDG-PET staging of head and neck cancer--can improved imaging lead to improved treatment?
Schwartz DL; Macapinlac HA; Weber RS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):688-9. PubMed ID: 18477798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
