BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26783213)

  • 21. Public confidence in ADR identification and their views on ADRreporting: mixed methods study.
    Jarernsiripornkul N; Patsuree A; Krska J
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2017 Feb; 73(2):223-231. PubMed ID: 27837337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Knowledge attitude and practice of Turkish health professionals towards pharmacovigilance in a university hospital.
    Ergün Y; Ergün TB; Toker E; Ünal E; Akben M
    Int Health; 2019 May; 11(3):177-184. PubMed ID: 30265317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pharmacists' attitudes towards the reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions in Norway.
    Granas AG; Buajordet M; Stenberg-Nilsen H; Harg P; Horn AM
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2007 Apr; 16(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 16953518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Knowledge of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting and the Pharmacovigilance of Biological Medicines: A Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Ireland.
    O'Callaghan J; Griffin BT; Morris JM; Bermingham M
    BioDrugs; 2018 Jun; 32(3):267-280. PubMed ID: 29721705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Knowledge, attitude and practices associated with adverse drug reaction reporting amongst doctors in a teaching hospital.
    Chopra D; Wardhan N; Rehan HS
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2011; 23(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 22156087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An observational study to compare the contents and quality of information furnished in CDSCO ADR reporting form, yellow card, medwatch and blue form by the healthcare professionals.
    Rehan HS; Chopra D; Holani SN; Mishra R
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2014; 26(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 24796346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors that condition the spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions among nurses: an integrative review.
    De Angelis A; Colaceci S; Giusti A; Vellone E; Alvaro R
    J Nurs Manag; 2016 Mar; 24(2):151-63. PubMed ID: 25974355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reporting of adverse drug reactions in India: A review of the current scenario, obstacles and possible solutions.
    Mulchandani R; Kakkar AK
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2019; 30(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 30175985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nurses are increasingly involved in pharmacovigilance in Sweden.
    Ulfvarson J; Mejyr S; Bergman U
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2007 May; 16(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 17072915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The knowledge, attitude and behaviours of nurses about pharmacovigilance, adverse drug reaction and adverse event reporting in a state hospital.
    Vural F; Ciftci S; Vural B
    North Clin Istanb; 2014; 1(3):147-152. PubMed ID: 28058321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hospital pharmacists' knowledge and opinions regarding adverse drug reaction reporting in Northern China.
    Su C; Ji H; Su Y
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2010 Mar; 19(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 20033911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A survey of spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions in 10 years of activity in a pharmacovigilance centre in Portugal.
    Marques J; Ribeiro-Vaz I; Pereira AC; Polónia J
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2014 Aug; 22(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 24188533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Founding an adverse drug reaction (ADR) network: a method for improving doctors spontaneous ADR reporting in a general hospital.
    Goldstein LH; Berlin M; Saliba W; Elias M; Berkovitch M
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2013 Nov; 53(11):1220-5. PubMed ID: 23852627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adverse drug reaction reporting by nurses in Sweden.
    Bäckström M; Ekman E; Mjörndal T
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Jun; 63(6):613-8. PubMed ID: 17404719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multifaceted interventions for improving spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions in a general hospital in China.
    Fang H; Lin X; Zhang J; Hong Z; Sugiyama K; Nozaki T; Sameshima T; Kobayashi S; Namba H; Asakawa T
    BMC Pharmacol Toxicol; 2017 Jun; 18(1):49. PubMed ID: 28651624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions by nurses.
    Bäckström M; Mjörndal T; Dahlqvist R
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2002 Dec; 11(8):647-50. PubMed ID: 12512239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Adverse drug reactions reporting: a questionnaire-based study on Egyptian pharmacists' attitudes following an awareness workshop.
    Alraie NA; Saad AA; Sabry NA; Farid SF
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2016 Jun; 22(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 26638825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Impact of the Educational Intervention on Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Pharmacovigilance toward Adverse Drug Reactions Reporting among Health-care Professionals in a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India.
    Ganesan S; Sandhiya S; Reddy KC; Subrahmanyam DK; Adithan C
    J Nat Sci Biol Med; 2017; 8(2):203-209. PubMed ID: 28781488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficacy of an adverse drug reaction electronic reporting system integrated into a hospital information system.
    Ortega A; Aguinagalde A; Lacasa C; Aquerreta I; Fernández-Benítez M; Fernández LM
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1491-6. PubMed ID: 18780808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of information letters on the reporting rate of adverse drug reactions and the quality of the reports: a randomized controlled study.
    Johansson ML; Hägg S; Wallerstedt SM
    BMC Clin Pharmacol; 2011 Sep; 11():14. PubMed ID: 21899766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.