These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2678420)

  • 1. Accuracy of alginate and elastomeric impression materials.
    Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E
    Scand J Dent Res; 1989 Aug; 97(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 2678420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of disinfecting solutions on accuracy of alginate and elastomeric impressions.
    Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E
    Scand J Dent Res; 1989 Oct; 97(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 2515589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material.
    Endo T; Finger WJ
    Quintessence Int; 2006 Jan; 37(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16429703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of disinfecting solutions on surface texture of alginate and elastomeric impressions.
    Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E
    Scand J Dent Res; 1990 Feb; 98(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 2109349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of stone dies produced by different impression materials. A comparative study of impression techniques.
    Wiktorsson G; Feder D
    Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 6348989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlation between the degree of deformation of the stone die and the amount of the master die undercut. Part 1. Single tooth die.
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Abe T; Yamamoto Y; Takenaka M
    Aichi Gakuin Dent Sci; 1989; 2():57-65. PubMed ID: 2701499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of material bulk and undercuts on the accuracy of impression materials.
    de Araujo PA; Jorgensen KD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Dec; 54(6):791-4. PubMed ID: 3908659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Measuring the accuracy of various elastomeric impression materials using a CNC coordinate measuring device (Part 1)].
    Wichmann M; Borchers L; Limmroth E
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Aug; 45(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 2269183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dimensional stability of seven elastomeric impression materials immersed in disinfectants.
    Thouati A; Deveaux E; Iost A; Behin P
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jul; 76(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 8814627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
    Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-disinfecting Alginate vs Conventional Alginate: Effect on Surface Hardness of Gypsum Cast-An in vitro Study.
    Madhavan R; George N; Thummala NR; Ravi SV; Nagpal A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Nov; 18(11):1061-1064. PubMed ID: 29109322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of a range of disinfectants on the dimensional accuracy of some impression materials.
    Jagger DC; Al Jabra O; Harrison A; Vowles RW; McNally L
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Dec; 12(4):154-60. PubMed ID: 15691188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Elastomeric impression materials: a comparison of accuracy of multiple pours.
    Kumar D; Madihalli AU; Reddy KR; Rastogi N; Pradeep NT
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jul; 12(4):272-8. PubMed ID: 22186862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the compatibility of elastomeric impression materials, type IV dental stones, and liquid media.
    Gerrow JD; Schneider RL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Mar; 57(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 3553549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EVALUATION OF MATERIALS USED FOR INDIRECT TECHNICS.
    PEYTON FA
    Dent Clin North Am; 1965 Mar; 23():213-23. PubMed ID: 14276026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.