These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26784448)

  • 1. Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making.
    Schöbel M; Rieskamp J; Huber R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146536. PubMed ID: 26784448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reading people's minds from emotion expressions in interdependent decision making.
    de Melo CM; Carnevale PJ; Read SJ; Gratch J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Jan; 106(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 24079297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling other minds: Bayesian inference explains human choices in group decision-making.
    Khalvati K; Park SA; Mirbagheri S; Philippe R; Sestito M; Dreher JC; Rao RPN
    Sci Adv; 2019 Nov; 5(11):eaax8783. PubMed ID: 31807706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A decision network account of reasoning about other people's choices.
    Jern A; Kemp C
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():12-38. PubMed ID: 26010559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How social and non-social information influence classification decisions: A computational modelling approach.
    Puskaric M; von Helversen B; Rieskamp J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1516-1534. PubMed ID: 27311016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An event-based account of conformity.
    Kim D; Hommel B
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Apr; 26(4):484-9. PubMed ID: 25749696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The integration of social influence and reward: Computational approaches and neural evidence.
    Tomlin D; Nedic A; Prentice DA; Holmes P; Cohen JD
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 17(4):784-808. PubMed ID: 28540647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayes Optimal Integration of Social and Endogenous Uncertainty in Numerosity Estimation.
    Öztel T; Balcı F
    Cogn Sci; 2024 Apr; 48(4):e13447. PubMed ID: 38659095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Social influence and perceptual decision making: a diffusion model analysis.
    Germar M; Schlemmer A; Krug K; Voss A; Mojzisch A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Feb; 40(2):217-31. PubMed ID: 24154917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An application of a dual-process approach to decision making in social dilemmas.
    Liu CJ; Hao F
    Am J Psychol; 2011; 124(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 21834405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning about and from others' prudence, impatience or laziness: The computational bases of attitude alignment.
    Devaine M; Daunizeau J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Mar; 13(3):e1005422. PubMed ID: 28358869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integration of Social Information by Human Groups.
    Granovskiy B; Gold JM; Sumpter DJ; Goldstone RL
    Top Cogn Sci; 2015 Jul; 7(3):469-93. PubMed ID: 26189568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biased sequential sampling underlies the effects of time pressure and delay in social decision making.
    Chen F; Krajbich I
    Nat Commun; 2018 Sep; 9(1):3557. PubMed ID: 30177719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Social learning under acute stress.
    Cingl L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202335. PubMed ID: 30133497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferring on the intentions of others by hierarchical Bayesian learning.
    Diaconescu AO; Mathys C; Weber LA; Daunizeau J; Kasper L; Lomakina EI; Fehr E; Stephan KE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2014 Sep; 10(9):e1003810. PubMed ID: 25187943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The costs of benefits: help-refusals highlight key trade-offs of social life.
    Ackerman JM; Kenrick DT
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2008 May; 12(2):118-40. PubMed ID: 18453475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Information about peer choices shapes human risky decision-making.
    Tomova L; Pessoa L
    Sci Rep; 2018 Apr; 8(1):5129. PubMed ID: 29651013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collective decision making by rational individuals.
    Mann RP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Oct; 115(44):E10387-E10396. PubMed ID: 30322917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk preference and choice stochasticity during decisions for other people.
    Rigoli F; Preller KH; Dolan RJ
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 18(2):331-341. PubMed ID: 29549530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian collective learning emerges from heuristic social learning.
    Krafft PM; Shmueli E; Griffiths TL; Tenenbaum JB; Pentland AS
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104469. PubMed ID: 33770743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.