These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26784858)
1. The Dysexecutive Questionnaire Revised (DEX-R): An extended measure of everyday dysexecutive problems after acquired brain injury. Simblett SK; Ring H; Bateman A Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2017 Dec; 27(8):1124-1141. PubMed ID: 26784858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validating independent ratings of executive functioning following acquired brain injury using Rasch analysis. Simblett SK; Badham R; Greening K; Adlam A; Ring H; Bateman A Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2012; 22(6):874-89. PubMed ID: 22804712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dysexecutive symptoms and carer strain following acquired brain injury: Changes measured before and after holistic neuropsychological rehabilitation. Goodwin RA; Lincoln NB; Bateman A NeuroRehabilitation; 2016 Jun; 39(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 27341361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring coping style following acquired brain injury: a modification of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations Using Rasch analysis. Simblett SK; Gracey F; Ring H; Bateman A Br J Clin Psychol; 2015 Sep; 54(3):249-65. PubMed ID: 25546116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dimensions of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX) examined using Rasch analysis. Simblett SK; Bateman A Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2011 Jan; 21(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 21181602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychometric properties of the awareness questionnaire, patient competency rating scale and Dysexecutive Questionnaire in patients with acquired brain injury. Hellebrekers D; Winkens I; Kruiper S; Van Heugten C Brain Inj; 2017; 31(11):1469-1478. PubMed ID: 28980822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter-rater reliability of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX): comparative data from non-clinician respondents-all raters are not equal. Barker LA; Morton N; Morrison TG; McGuire BE Brain Inj; 2011; 25(10):997-1004. PubMed ID: 21749190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ecological validity of the Multiple Errands Test using predictive models of dysexecutive problems in everyday life. Cuberos-Urbano G; Caracuel A; Vilar-López R; Valls-Serrano C; Bateman A; Verdejo-García A J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2013; 35(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 23458357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX). Ratings by patients with brain injury and their therapists. Emmanouel A; Mouza E; Kessels RP; Fasotti L Brain Inj; 2014; 28(12):1581-9. PubMed ID: 25121459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ecological validity of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire: Results from the PariS-TBI study. Azouvi P; Vallat-Azouvi C; Millox V; Darnoux E; Ghout I; Azerad S; Ruet A; Bayen E; Pradat-Diehl P; Aegerter P; Weiss JJ; Jourdan C Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2015; 25(6):864-78. PubMed ID: 25523796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of everyday dysexecutive symptoms in normal aging with the Greek version of the dysexecutive questionnaire-revised. Dimitriadou M; Michaelides MP; Bateman A; Constantinidou F Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2020 Jul; 30(6):1024-1043. PubMed ID: 30444178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychometric Properties of the Revised Dysexecutive Questionnaire in a Non-clinical Population. Wakely H; Radakovic R; Bateman A; Simblett S; Fish J; Gracey F Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():767367. PubMed ID: 35308604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX) in Alzheimer's disease: validation of a behavioral rating scale to assess dysexecutive symptoms in Japanese patients with Alzheimer's disease. Shinagawa Y; Nakaaki S; Hongo J; Murata Y; Sato J; Matsui T; Tatsumi H; Akechi T; Furukawa TA Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2007 Oct; 22(10):951-6. PubMed ID: 17299806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Dysexecutive Questionnaire advanced: item and test score characteristics, 4-factor solution, and severity classification. Bodenburg S; Dopslaff N J Nerv Ment Dis; 2008 Jan; 196(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 18195646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The development of a measure of social cognition following acquired brain injury. Cattran C; Oddy M; Ramos SDS; Goodson A; Wood R Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2018 Jun; 28(4):633-648. PubMed ID: 27398837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fractionation of the dysexecutive syndrome in a heterogeneous neurological sample: comparing the Dysexecutive Questionnaire and the Brock Adaptive Functioning Questionnaire. Chaytor N; Schmitter-Edgecombe M Brain Inj; 2007 Jun; 21(6):615-21. PubMed ID: 17577712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychometric validation of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX). Shaw S; Oei TPS; Sawang S Psychol Assess; 2015 Mar; 27(1):138-147. PubMed ID: 25602692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The effect of age on executive functioning after acquired brain injury in adults]. Chevignard M; Taillefer C; Poncet F; Picq C; Pradat-Diehl P Rev Neurol (Paris); 2008 Dec; 164(12):1018-27. PubMed ID: 18808778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of patient and proxy ratings on the Dysexecutive Questionnaire: an application of Rasch analysis. Chan RC; Bode RK J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2008 Jan; 79(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 17635974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ecological validity of executive tests in a severely brain injured sample. Wood RL; Liossi C Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Aug; 21(5):429-37. PubMed ID: 16879945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]