These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 267853)

  • 1. A scanning electron microscope study of cavity margins finished by different methods.
    Rodda JC; Gavin JB
    N Z Dent J; 1977 Apr; 73(332):64-70. PubMed ID: 267853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Finishing of the cavity margins of silver amalgam: scanning electron microscopy observations].
    Bianchi S; Poggio C; Piacentini C
    Dent Cadmos; 1984 Dec; 52(12):73-5, 77. PubMed ID: 6598791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro evaluation of the marginal integrity of a porcelain inlay system.
    Qualtrough AJ; Cramer A; Wilson NH; Roulet JF; Noack M
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(6):517-23. PubMed ID: 1817522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth.
    Couegnat G; Fok SL; Cooper JE; Qualtrough AJ
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16061281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin composite inlays.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Borgmeijer PJ; Gruythuysen RJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1994; 61(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8182195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The effect of modified forms of preparation on the quality of SR Isosit composite inlay margins].
    Hannig M; Weinle S; Albers HK
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Sep; 46(9):611-4. PubMed ID: 1817943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Proximo-occlusal restoration of the upper premolars].
    Santoro JP; Baldensperger R; Freiche R; Lemoine C; Maestroni F; Petitet NF
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1972 Dec; 26(100):533-54. PubMed ID: 4657291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of CEREC II and CEREC III inlays.
    Estafan D; Dussetschleger F; Agosta C; Reich S
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 15055635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Topography of the tooth-silver amalgam junction. Study of ion exchanges at the interface].
    Auther A; Manas F
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1981; 35(136):609-19. PubMed ID: 7344446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Amalgam onlay restoration].
    Doukoudakis S
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1989; 33(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 2486357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study).
    Kamel FM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparative study, using scanning electron microscopy, on the precision of the finish of the cervical margins of prosthetic crowns, executed on abutment teeth].
    Beltrame A
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1984; 3(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 6399506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptation of some dental restoratives to cavity walls as observed with the scanning electron microscope.
    Meurman JH; Asikainen M; Nevaste M
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1975 Apr; 71(2):36-44. PubMed ID: 1144380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation.
    Wolfart S; Wegner SM; Al-Halabi A; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 14714835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The influence of cavity preparation on the width of marginal gaps in Cerec inlays].
    Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Oct; 45(10):675-7. PubMed ID: 2269078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A 5-year evaluation of ceramic inlays (CEREC).
    Berg NG; Dérand T
    Swed Dent J; 1997; 21(4):121-7. PubMed ID: 9413909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short-term evaluation of resin sealing and rebonding on amalgam microleakage: an SEM observation.
    Moosavi H; Sadeghi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Mar; 9(3):32-9. PubMed ID: 18335117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Must the cusps of lateral tooth inlays be connected? A critical study of 2500 long-term cases].
    Schray K
    ZWR; 1984 Nov; 93(11):925-6, 928-9. PubMed ID: 6596812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.