These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26785767)

  • 1. The psychology of psychology: A thought experiment.
    Ceci SJ; Williams WM
    Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e137. PubMed ID: 26785767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the history of political diversity in social psychology.
    Binning KR; Sears DO
    Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e135. PubMed ID: 26787456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reports of assent and permission in research with children: illustrations and suggestions.
    Range LM; Cotton CR
    Ethics Behav; 1995; 5(1):49-66. PubMed ID: 11654170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How do IRB members make decisions? A review and research agenda.
    Pritchard IA
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2011 Jun; 6(2):31-46. PubMed ID: 21680975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Undergraduate research and the institutional review board: a mismatch or happy marriage?
    Kallgren CA; Tauber RT
    Teach Psychol; 1996 Feb; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 11655063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Commentary: labeling institutional review board members does not lead to better protections for research participants.
    Speers MA; Rose S
    Acad Med; 2012 Jul; 87(7):842-4. PubMed ID: 22735560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The institutional review board and beyond: future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation.
    Edgar H; Rothman DJ
    Milbank Q; 1995; 73(4):489-506. PubMed ID: 7491097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Financial relationships between institutional review board members and industry.
    Campbell EG; Weissman JS; Vogeli C; Clarridge BR; Abraham M; Marder JE; Koski G
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Nov; 355(22):2321-9. PubMed ID: 17135585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Justification and authority in institutional review board decision letters.
    Clapp JT; Gleason KA; Joffe S
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Dec; 194():25-33. PubMed ID: 29059597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Political diversity will improve social psychological science.
    Duarte JL; Crawford JT; Stern C; Haidt J; Jussim L; Tetlock PE
    Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e130. PubMed ID: 25036715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The evaluation of the risks and benefits of phase II cancer clinical trials by institutional review board (IRB) members: a case study.
    van Luijn HE; Aaronson NK; Keus RB; Musschenga AW
    J Med Ethics; 2006 Mar; 32(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 16507666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool to Guide Quality Improvement.
    Hall DE; Hanusa BH; Ling BS; Stone RA; Switzer GE; Fine MJ; Arnold RM
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Dec; 10(5):460-9. PubMed ID: 26527369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dealing With Diversity in Psychology: Science or Ideology?
    Hommel B
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2024 May; 19(3):558-563. PubMed ID: 38652783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Investigation of Empiricism. On Ernst Mach's Conception of the Thought Experiment].
    Krauthausen K
    Ber Wiss; 2015 Mar; 38(1):15-40. PubMed ID: 26140511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confidence of IRB/REC Members in Their Assessments of Human Research Risk: A Study of IRB/REC Decision Making in Action.
    Grinnell F; Sadler JZ; McNamara V; Senetar K; Reisch J
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Jul; 12(3):140-149. PubMed ID: 28558484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk assessment as a paradox: when actions of an IRB become incompatible with ethical principles.
    Ranjbar V
    Account Res; 2012; 19(5):273-84. PubMed ID: 23009268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. It may be harder than we thought, but political diversity will (still) improve social psychological science.
    Crawford JT; Duarte JL; Haidt J; Jussim L; Stern C; Tetlock PE
    Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e164. PubMed ID: 26816000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Barriers to Effective Deliberation in Clinical Research Oversight.
    Wenner DM
    HEC Forum; 2016 Sep; 28(3):245-59. PubMed ID: 26613717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patients come from populations and populations contain patients. A two-stage scientific and ethics review: The next adaptation for single institutional review boards.
    Knopman D; Alford E; Tate K; Long M; Khachaturian AS
    Alzheimers Dement; 2017 Aug; 13(8):940-946. PubMed ID: 28709585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conducting industrial and organizational psychological research: institutional review of research in work organizations.
    Ilgen DR; Bell BS
    Ethics Behav; 2001; 11(4):395-412. PubMed ID: 11838504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.