These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26785767)

  • 21. Case study in psychobiographical ethics.
    Ponterotto JG
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2013 Oct; 8(4):19-27. PubMed ID: 24169418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Risks and wrongs in social science research. An evaluator's guide to the IRB.
    Oakes JM
    Eval Rev; 2002 Oct; 26(5):443-79. PubMed ID: 12243104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perspectives of research participants, psychologist investigators, and institutional review boards.
    Schreier BA; Stadler HA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1067-72. PubMed ID: 1501970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ethics approval: responsibilities of journal editors, authors and research ethics committees.
    Bain LE
    Pan Afr Med J; 2017; 28():200. PubMed ID: 29610638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Teaching research ethics: illustrating the nature of the researcher-IRB relationship.
    Brinthaupt TM
    Teach Psychol; 2002; 29(3):243-5. PubMed ID: 15295829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Industry Relationships Among Academic Institutional Review Board Members: Changes From 2005 Through 2014.
    Campbell EG; Vogeli C; Rao SR; Abraham M; Pierson R; Applebaum S
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Sep; 175(9):1500-6. PubMed ID: 26168043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is compliance a professional virtue of researchers? Reflections on promoting the responsible conduct of research.
    DuBois JM
    Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(4):383-95. PubMed ID: 16625734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ethics Review for a Multi-Site Project Involving Tribal Nations in the Northern Plains.
    Angal J; Petersen JM; Tobacco D; Elliott AJ;
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Apr; 11(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 26928897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Gatekeepers of science: attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability.
    McDonald KE; Keys CB; Henry DB
    Am J Ment Retard; 2008 Nov; 113(6):466-78. PubMed ID: 19127657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Should research ethics committees be told how to think?
    Sayers GM
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Jan; 33(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 17209109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ethical Conduct of Research in Children: Pediatricians and Their IRB (Part 2 of 2).
    Rose CD
    Pediatrics; 2017 Jun; 139(6):. PubMed ID: 28562269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A qualitative study of non-affiliated, non-scientist institutional review board members.
    Anderson EE
    Account Res; 2006; 13(2):135-55. PubMed ID: 16827216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Distinguishing science from pseudoscience in school psychology: science and scientific thinking as safeguards against human error.
    Lilienfeld SO; Ammirati R; David M
    J Sch Psychol; 2012 Feb; 50(1):7-36. PubMed ID: 22386075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The purpose, composition, and function of an institutional review board: balancing priorities.
    Enfield KB; Truwit JD
    Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1330-6. PubMed ID: 18811996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Some reflections on evaluating institutional review board effectiveness.
    Resnik DB
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt B):261-264. PubMed ID: 26408053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of IRB requirements on a multicenter survey of prophylactic mastectomy outcomes.
    Greene SM; Geiger AM; Harris EL; Altschuler A; Nekhlyudov L; Barton MB; Rolnick SJ; Elmore JG; Fletcher S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 16(4):275-8. PubMed ID: 16005245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sustaining engagement and partnership: model of enhancing cultural capital among nonaffiliated IRB members.
    Hung Y; Ayala A; Morales F; Frierman-Hunt G; Moreno A; Nwachuku I
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2013 Jul; 8(3):34-45. PubMed ID: 23933774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Understanding institutional review boards: practical guidance to the IRB review process.
    Pech C; Cob N; Cejka JT
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 22(6):618-28. PubMed ID: 18042949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Institutional Review Board approval and innovation in urology: current practice and safety issues.
    Sundaram V; Vemana G; Bhayani SB
    BJU Int; 2014 Feb; 113(2):343-7. PubMed ID: 23937601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.