These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2678593)

  • 21. Indications for intravenous and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the diagnosis of cerebrovascular insufficiency. A new diagnostic concept including ultrasound.
    Neufang KF; Friedmann G
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 May; 5(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 3888629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Digital subtraction arteriography. A new method for evaluation of extracranial occlusive disease.
    Celesia GG; Strother CM; Turski PA; Stieghorst MF; Sackett JF; Mistretta CA
    Arch Neurol; 1983 Feb; 40(2):70-4. PubMed ID: 6824452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and digital angiography of the epiaortic vessels].
    Carriero A; Salute L; Toppetti A; Bonomo L
    Radiol Med; 1991 Jun; 81(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 1857782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The complementary value of Doppler-ultrasonography and ocular pneumoplethysmography according to Gee (OPG-Gee) in carotid obstructions.
    Strik F
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 1988; 90(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 3058370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Comparison of Doppler ultrasound, intravenous DSA and conventional film angiography in diagnosing stenosing changes in the area of the carotid bifurcation].
    Gmelin E; Borgis CJ; Kummer D; Tänzer B; Weiss HD
    Rofo; 1985 Jan; 142(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 2982191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Continuous-wave versus range-gated pulsed Doppler power frequency spectrum analysis in the detection of carotid arterial occlusive disease.
    Harward TR; Bernstein EF; Fronek A
    Ann Surg; 1986 Jul; 204(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 3524481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Possibility of errors in conventional Doppler sonography of the carotid arteries].
    Nichtweiss M; Wiegand C; Wuppermann T
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1987 Nov; 112(47):1807-11. PubMed ID: 3315548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The validation of duplex scanning and continuous wave Doppler imaging: a comparison with conventional angiography.
    Hames TK; Humphries KN; Ratliff DA; Birch SJ; Gazzard VM; Chant AD
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1985; 11(6):827-34. PubMed ID: 3913081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Doppler ultrasound technique compared to angiography, intraoperative pressure gradients and blood flow measurements in carotid surgery (author's transl)].
    Liljeqvist L; Ekeström S; Nordhus O
    Thoraxchir Vask Chir; 1977 Aug; 25(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 929550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Diagnosis of extracranial carotid diseases. Doppler-echo flow and transvenous digital subtraction angiography].
    Berger G; Sprügel W; Seyferth W
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1983 Jan; 108(3):86-93. PubMed ID: 6822199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Detection of vertebrobasilar intracranial stenoses: transcranial Doppler sonography versus angiography.
    de Bray JM; Missoum A; Dubas F; Emile J; Lhoste P
    J Ultrasound Med; 1997 Mar; 16(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 9166821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of contralateral obstructions on Doppler-frequency spectral analysis of ipsilateral stenoses of the carotid arteries.
    Fischer M; Alexander K
    Stroke; 1985; 16(5):846-8. PubMed ID: 3901423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Non-invasive assessment of carotid arteries: a comparison of techniques used in two laboratories.
    Mashiah A; Rabinovitz T; Cohen R; Beer G; Pasik S; Romanov H
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1989; 30(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 2651454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The limitations of diagnosis of carotid occlusion by Doppler ultrasound.
    Bornstein NM; Beloev ZG; Norris JW
    Ann Surg; 1988 Mar; 207(3):315-7. PubMed ID: 3278698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Carotid stenosis: early detection].
    Rohr J
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1984 Jul; 114(27-28):974-82. PubMed ID: 6474121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnostic criteria for carotid duplex sonography.
    Robinson ML; Sacks D; Perlmutter GS; Marinelli DL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Nov; 151(5):1045-9. PubMed ID: 3051956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
    Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS
    Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Noninvasive differentiation of carotid artery occlusion from high-grade stenosis.
    Hill SL; Christie A; McDannald ER; Donato AT; Martin D
    Am Surg; 1987 Feb; 53(2):84-93. PubMed ID: 3544989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Power Doppler--a new tool for transcranial duplex assessment of intracranial vasculature.
    Griewing B; Doherty C; Zeller JA; Kallwellis G; Walker ML; Kessler C
    Bildgebung; 1996 Mar; 63(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 8653006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of patients for carotid endarterectomy.
    Kaye AH; Little JR; Bryerton B; Modic M
    J Neurosurg; 1983 Nov; 59(5):835-8. PubMed ID: 6619935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.