These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26786891)
1. Differences in Multi-Modal Ultrasound Imaging between Triple Negative and Non-Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Li Z; Tian J; Wang X; Wang Y; Wang Z; Zhang L; Jing H; Wu T Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Apr; 42(4):882-90. PubMed ID: 26786891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of Tumor Sizing in Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Strain Elastography, 3-D Ultrasound and Conventional B-Mode Ultrasound with and without Compound Imaging. Stachs A; Pandjaitan A; Martin A; Stubert J; Hartmann S; Gerber B; Glass Ä Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2758-2765. PubMed ID: 27600473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Ultrasound Elastography and Color Doppler Ultrasonography for Distinguishing Small Triple-Negative Breast Cancer From Fibroadenoma. Yeo SH; Kim GR; Lee SH; Moon WK J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Sep; 37(9):2135-2146. PubMed ID: 29424448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of automated breast 3-D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses. Chen L; Chen Y; Diao XH; Fang L; Pang Y; Cheng AQ; Li WP; Wang Y Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1735-42. PubMed ID: 23849390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3-D visualization and non-linear tissue classification of breast tumors using ultrasound elastography in vivo. Sayed A; Layne G; Abraham J; Mukdadi OM Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1490-502. PubMed ID: 24768484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions. Ianculescu V; Ciolovan LM; Dunant A; Vielh P; Mazouni C; Delaloge S; Dromain C; Blidaru A; Balleyguier C Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):773-7. PubMed ID: 24602803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer: mammographic, US, and MR imaging features according to androgen receptor expression. Bae MS; Park SY; Song SE; Kim WH; Lee SH; Han W; Park IA; Noh DY; Moon WK Eur Radiol; 2015 Feb; 25(2):419-27. PubMed ID: 25224727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiomics of US texture features in differential diagnosis between triple-negative breast cancer and fibroadenoma. Lee SE; Han K; Kwak JY; Lee E; Kim EK Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13546. PubMed ID: 30202040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter. Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined Use of Ultrasound Elastography and B-Mode Sonography for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Circumscribed Breast Masses. Kim SY; Park JS; Koo HR J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1951-9. PubMed ID: 26384609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses. Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinicopathological and Ultrasonic Features of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers: A Comparison with Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-Negative Breast Cancers. Wang D; Zhu K; Tian J; Li Z; Du G; Guo Q; Wu T; Li J Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 May; 44(5):1124-1132. PubMed ID: 29482888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semi-quantitative and qualitative assessment of breast ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign lesions. Alhabshi SM; Rahmat K; Abdul Halim N; Aziz S; Radhika S; Gan GC; Vijayananthan A; Westerhout CJ; Mohd-Shah MN; Jaszle S; Harlina Mohd Latar N; Muhammad R Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):568-78. PubMed ID: 23384468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging. Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio. Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of real-time tissue sono-elastography in the assessment of 214 breast lesions: limitations of this method resulting from different histologic subtypes, tumor size and tumor localization. Farrokh A; Wojcinski S; Degenhardt F Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2264-71. PubMed ID: 24063962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Strain elastography for prediction of breast cancer tumor grades. Grajo JR; Barr RG J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 24371107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions. Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast Elastography: How We Do It. Gkali CA; Chalazonitis AN; Feida E; Sotiropoulou M; Giannos A; Tsigginou A; Dimitrakakis C Ultrasound Q; 2015 Dec; 31(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 26327432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Freehand elastography for determination of breast cancer size: comparison with B-mode sonography and histopathologic measurement. Zippel D; Shalmon A; Rundstein A; Novikov I; Yosepovich A; Zbar A; Goitein D; Sklair-Levy M J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Aug; 33(8):1441-6. PubMed ID: 25063409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]