These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26787073)
1. Welcoming conservatives to the field. Nisbett R Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e152. PubMed ID: 26787073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Should social psychologists create a disciplinary affirmative action program for political conservatives? Shweder RA Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e158. PubMed ID: 26787422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What kinds of conservatives does social psychology lack, and why? Ross L Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e156. PubMed ID: 26786133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When theory trumps ideology: Lessons from evolutionary psychology. Tybur JM; Navarrete CD Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e159. PubMed ID: 26785604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Liberals and conservatives: Non-convertible currencies. Hibbing JR; Smith KB; Alford JR Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e145. PubMed ID: 26786407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Duarte JL; Crawford JT; Stern C; Haidt J; Jussim L; Tetlock PE Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e130. PubMed ID: 25036715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Political bias is tenacious. Ditto PH; Wojcik SP; Chen EE; Grady RH; Ringel MM Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e140. PubMed ID: 26786070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Too paranoid to see progress: Social psychology is probably liberal, but it doesn't believe in progress. Winegard B; Winegard B; Geary DC Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e162. PubMed ID: 26785792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sociopolitical diversity in psychology. The case for pluralism. Redding RE Am Psychol; 2001 Mar; 56(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 11315246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Towards a de-biased social psychology: The effects of ideological perspective go beyond politics. Funder DC Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e143. PubMed ID: 26786293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is liberal bias universal? An international perspective on social psychologists. Bilewicz M; Cichocka A; Górska P; Szabó ZP Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e134. PubMed ID: 26787320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the history of political diversity in social psychology. Binning KR; Sears DO Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e135. PubMed ID: 26787456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. False Equivalence: Are Liberals and Conservatives in the United States Equally Biased? Baron J; Jost JT Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 Mar; 14(2):292-303. PubMed ID: 30836901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Liberal bias and the five-factor model. Charney E Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e139. PubMed ID: 26785949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A checklist to facilitate objective hypothesis testing in social psychology research. Washburn AN; Morgan GS; Skitka LJ Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e161. PubMed ID: 26786969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Larregue's Critique of Cofnas et al. (2017): A Rejoinder. Cofnas N; Carl N; Woodley Of Menie MA Am Sociol; 2018; 49(2):328-335. PubMed ID: 29962513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mischaracterizing social psychology to support the laudable goal of increasing its political diversity. Eagly AH Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e141. PubMed ID: 26786762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Political Diversity in Social and Personality Psychology. Inbar Y; Lammers J Perspect Psychol Sci; 2012 Sep; 7(5):496-503. PubMed ID: 26168506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Political attitudes in social environments. Gelman A; Gross N Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e144. PubMed ID: 26786356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]