These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26787369)

  • 1. Tipping the scales: Evolution of the allometric slope independent of average trait size.
    Stillwell RC; Shingleton AW; Dworkin I; Frankino WA
    Evolution; 2016 Feb; 70(2):433-44. PubMed ID: 26787369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cryptic individual scaling relationships and the evolution of morphological scaling.
    Dreyer AP; Saleh Ziabari O; Swanson EM; Chawla A; Frankino WA; Shingleton AW
    Evolution; 2016 Aug; 70(8):1703-16. PubMed ID: 27337566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New perspectives on the evolution of exaggerated traits.
    Shingleton AW; Frankino WA
    Bioessays; 2013 Feb; 35(2):100-7. PubMed ID: 23255216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complex constraints on allometry revealed by artificial selection on the wing of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Bolstad GH; Cassara JA; Márquez E; Hansen TF; van der Linde K; Houle D; Pélabon C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Oct; 112(43):13284-9. PubMed ID: 26371319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interspecific comparison of allometry between body weight and chest girth in domestic bovids.
    Anzai H; Oishi K; Kumagai H; Hosoi E; Nakanishi Y; Hirooka H
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):4817. PubMed ID: 28684855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic variation of morphological scaling in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Wilcox AS; Vea IM; Frankino WA; Shingleton AW
    Heredity (Edinb); 2023 May; 130(5):302-311. PubMed ID: 36878946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual Cryptic Scaling Relationships and the Evolution of Animal Form.
    Frankino WA; Bakota E; Dworkin I; Wilkinson GS; Wolf JB; Shingleton AW
    Integr Comp Biol; 2019 Nov; 59(5):1411-1428. PubMed ID: 31364716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental manipulation of body size to estimate morphological scaling relationships in Drosophila.
    Stillwell RC; Dworkin I; Shingleton AW; Frankino WA
    J Vis Exp; 2011 Oct; (56):. PubMed ID: 21989026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why does allometry evolve so slowly?
    Houle D; Jones LT; Fortune R; Sztepanacz JL
    Integr Comp Biol; 2019 Nov; 59(5):1429-1440. PubMed ID: 31198948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Many ways to be small: different environmental regulators of size generate distinct scaling relationships in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Shingleton AW; Estep CM; Driscoll MV; Dworkin I
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Jul; 276(1667):2625-33. PubMed ID: 19386657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Origin of Novelty Through the Evolution of Scaling Relationships.
    Nijhout HF; McKenna KZ
    Integr Comp Biol; 2017 Dec; 57(6):1322-1333. PubMed ID: 28633448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the relationship between ontogenetic and static allometry.
    Pélabon C; Bolstad GH; Egset CK; Cheverud JM; Pavlicev M; Rosenqvist G
    Am Nat; 2013 Feb; 181(2):195-212. PubMed ID: 23348774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolution of morphological allometry.
    Pélabon C; Firmat C; Bolstad GH; Voje KL; Houle D; Cassara J; Rouzic AL; Hansen TF
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2014 Jul; 1320():58-75. PubMed ID: 24913643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dependence of morphometric allometries on the growth kinetics of body parts.
    Nijhout HF
    J Theor Biol; 2011 Nov; 288():35-43. PubMed ID: 21864540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scaling of Morphological Characters across Trait Type, Sex, and Environment.
    Voje KL
    Am Nat; 2016 Jan; 187(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 27277405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Artificial selection on allometry: change in elevation but not slope.
    Egset CK; Hansen TF; LE Rouzic A; Bolstad GH; Rosenqvist G; Pélabon C
    J Evol Biol; 2012 May; 25(5):938-48. PubMed ID: 22404434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Body and limb size dissociation at the origin of birds: uncoupling allometric constraints across a macroevolutionary transition.
    Dececchi TA; Larsson HC
    Evolution; 2013 Sep; 67(9):2741-52. PubMed ID: 24033180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Allometric constraints and the evolution of allometry.
    Voje KL; Hansen TF; Egset CK; Bolstad GH; Pélabon C
    Evolution; 2014 Mar; 68(3):866-85. PubMed ID: 24219593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evolution of static allometry and constraint on evolutionary allometry in a fossil stickleback.
    Voje KL; Bell MA; Stuart YE
    J Evol Biol; 2022 Mar; 35(3):423-438. PubMed ID: 35073436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Internal and external constraints in the evolution of morphological allometries in a butterfly.
    Frankino WA; Zwaan BJ; Stern DL; Brakefield PM
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2958-70. PubMed ID: 17976182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.