These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26790779)

  • 1. Arthroplasty Registries, Patient Safety and Outlier Surgeons: the case for change.
    Cobb J
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2015 Dec; 81(4):594-9. PubMed ID: 26790779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in U.S. Total joint replacement registries: rationale, status, and plans.
    Franklin PD; Lewallen D; Bozic K; Hallstrom B; Jiranek W; Ayers DC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):104-9. PubMed ID: 25520425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Norwegian Joint Registry.
    Havelin LI
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 1999; 58(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 10642863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [German Total Ankle Replacement Register of the German Foot and Ankle Society (D. A. F.) - presentation of design and reliability of the data as well as first results].
    Kostuj T; Preis M; Walther M; Aghayev E; Krummenauer F; Röder C
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2014 Oct; 152(5):446-54. PubMed ID: 25313699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Results of total joint arthroplasty and joint preserving surgery in younger patients evaluated by alternative outcome measures.
    Klit J
    Dan Med J; 2014 Apr; 61(4):B4836. PubMed ID: 24814600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Total joint replacement surgery in a rural centre.
    Stewart GD; Stewart PC; Nott ML; Long G
    Aust J Rural Health; 2006 Dec; 14(6):253-7. PubMed ID: 17121504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Midterm results using a medial pivot total knee replacement compared with the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry data.
    Brinkman JM; Bubra PS; Walker P; Walsh WR; Bruce WJ
    ANZ J Surg; 2014 Mar; 84(3):172-6. PubMed ID: 24165225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cemented all polyethylene tibial insert unicompartimental knee arthroplasty: a long term follow-up study.
    Lustig S; Paillot JL; Servien E; Henry J; Ait Si Selmi T; Neyret P
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Feb; 95(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 19251232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictors of Low Patient-Reported Outcomes Response Rates in the California Joint Replacement Registry.
    Patel J; Lee JH; Li Z; SooHoo NF; Bozic K; Huddleston JI
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Dec; 30(12):2071-5. PubMed ID: 26195355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new universal, standardized implant database for product identification: a unique tool for arthroplasty registries.
    Blömer W; Steinbrück A; Schröder C; Grothaus FJ; Melsheimer O; Mannel H; Forkel G; Eilers T; Liebs TR; Hassenpflug J; Jansson V
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Jul; 135(7):919-26. PubMed ID: 25957983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why are total knee replacements revised?: analysis of early revision in a community knee implant registry.
    Gioe TJ; Killeen KK; Grimm K; Mehle S; Scheltema K
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Nov; (428):100-6. PubMed ID: 15534527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data.
    Goodfellow JW; O'Connor JJ; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Dec; 92(12):1628-31. PubMed ID: 21119165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Medin modular implant for total knee arthroplasty--mid-term results].
    Vavrík P; Landor I; Tomaides J; Popelka S
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Feb; 76(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 19268046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes in total joint arthroplasty registries: challenges and opportunities.
    Franklin PD; Harrold L; Ayers DC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Nov; 471(11):3482-8. PubMed ID: 23897504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Swedish Ankle Arthroplasty Register: An analysis of 531 arthroplasties between 1993 and 2005.
    Henricson A; Skoog A; Carlsson A
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Oct; 78(5):569-74. PubMed ID: 17966014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Espehaug B; Furnes O; Havelin LI; Engesaeter LB; Vollset SE; Kindseth O
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 16534702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures following total and unicondylar knee replacement.
    Baker PN; Petheram T; Jameson SS; Avery PJ; Reed MR; Gregg PJ; Deehan DJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jul; 94(7):919-27. PubMed ID: 22733946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Relative effect per patient (REPP)--outcome groups for total hip replacement and total knee replacement].
    Huber J; Dabis E; Zumstein MD; Hüsler J
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2013 Jun; 151(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 23696160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lower extremity implant registries: has the time come in the United States?
    Hyer CF; Portera WB; Haglund EM
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2010 Jun; 3(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 20407019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reasons for knee arthroplasty revisions are incomparable in the different arthroplasty registries.
    Niinimäki TT
    Knee; 2015 Mar; 22(2):142-4. PubMed ID: 25596073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.