168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26791701)
21. Universities scramble to assess scope of falsified results.
Dalton R
Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7064):7. PubMed ID: 16267515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Paolo Macchiarini's academic afterlife in Russia ends.
Astakhova A
Science; 2017 May; 356(6339):672-673. PubMed ID: 28522475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
Sovacool BK
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Negative results.
Nature; 2008 May; 453(7193):258. PubMed ID: 18480760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Confidentiality is essential in misconduct inquiries.
Mason S; Rutledge C
Nature; 2007 Mar; 446(7135):492. PubMed ID: 17392764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Biosafety trials darken outlook for transgenic crops in Europe.
Giles J
Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6960):751. PubMed ID: 14574368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Flawed ivermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies.
Reardon S
Nature; 2021 Aug; 596(7871):173-174. PubMed ID: 34341573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Further accusations rock Japanese RNA laboratory.
Fuyuno I
Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7085):720-1. PubMed ID: 16598217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Agbiotech. U.K. government panel gives GM crops cautious support.
Pickrell J
Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5632):447-8. PubMed ID: 12881538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Scientific misconduct: Research integrity guidelines in Japan.
Wada M
Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7520):35. PubMed ID: 25279908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Conflicts around a study of Mexican crops.
Suarez AV; Bernard M; Tsutsui ND; Blackledge TA; Copren K; Sarnat EM; Wild AL; Getz WM; Starks PT; Will K; Palsbøll PJ; Hauber ME; Moritz C; Richman AD
Nature; 2002 Jun; 417(6892):897; author reply 897-8. PubMed ID: 12087376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. 'Avalanche' of spider-paper retractions shakes behavioural-ecology community.
Viglione G
Nature; 2020 Feb; 578(7794):199-200. PubMed ID: 32047306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Conflicts around a study of Mexican crops.
Worthy K; Strohman RC; Billings PR
Nature; 2002 Jun; 417(6892):897; author reply 897-8. PubMed ID: 12087377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Stem-cell method faces fresh questions.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2014 Mar; 507(7492):283. PubMed ID: 24646974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Diversity in food technology.
Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):473. PubMed ID: 12891314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Harvard probe kept under wraps.
Ledford H
Nature; 2010 Aug; 466(7309):908-9. PubMed ID: 20725008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The problem of plagiarism.
Anderson MS; Steneck NH
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 21194643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A major failure of scientific governance.
Smith R; Godlee F
BMJ; 2015 Oct; 351():h5694. PubMed ID: 26514391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Researchers frustrated by Italian misconduct probe.
Abbott A
Nature; 2017 May; 545(7652):13-14. PubMed ID: 28470221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Collateral damage: How a case of misconduct brought a leading Japanese biology institute to its knees.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):600-3. PubMed ID: 25925457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
