299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26792002)
1. [Prostate cancer. Part 2: Review of the various tumor grading systems over the years 1966-2015 and future perspectives of the new grading of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)].
Helpap B; Bubendorf L; Kristiansen G
Pathologe; 2016 Feb; 37(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 26792002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Nerstrøm C; Røder MA; Iversen P; Toft BG; Vainer B; Brasso K
BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 26823232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The 2014 consensus conference of the ISUP on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma].
Kristiansen G; Egevad L; Amin M; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA; Epstein JI;
Pathologe; 2016 Feb; 37(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 26809207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer.
Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Gianduzzo T; Coughlin G; Duffy D; LeFevre I; Johannsen S; Egevad L; Yaxley J
Pathology; 2015 Oct; 47(6):515-9. PubMed ID: 26325670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Impact of International Association of Urological Pathology Gleason scoring system on prostatic carcinoma grading: a preliminary analysis of 185 cases].
Wang G; Shen D
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 43(10):677-9. PubMed ID: 25567594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer - An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading.
Egevad L; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Samaratunga H
APMIS; 2016 Jun; 124(6):433-5. PubMed ID: 27150257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combined histoarchitectural and cytological biopsy grading improves grading accuracy in low-grade prostate cancer.
Helpap B; Köllermann J
Int J Urol; 2012 Feb; 19(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 22103602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.
Huang CC; Kong MX; Zhou M; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS; Melamed J; Deng FM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gleason grading: past, present and future.
Delahunt B; Miller RJ; Srigley JR; Evans AJ; Samaratunga H
Histopathology; 2012 Jan; 60(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 22212079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implications of the International Society of Urological Pathology modified Gleason grading system.
Egevad L; Mazzucchelli R; Montironi R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Apr; 136(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 22458905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome of Gleason 3 + 5 = 8 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed on Needle Biopsy: Prognostic Comparison with Gleason 4 + 4 = 8.
Harding-Jackson N; Kryvenko ON; Whittington EE; Eastwood DC; Tjionas GA; Jorda M; Iczkowski KA
J Urol; 2016 Oct; 196(4):1076-81. PubMed ID: 27265220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer.
Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Srigley JR; Egevad L
Scand J Urol; 2016 Oct; 50(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 27415753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evolution, controversies and the future of prostate cancer grading.
Egevad L; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Samaratunga H
Pathol Int; 2019 Feb; 69(2):55-66. PubMed ID: 30694570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate cancer: from Gleason scoring to prognostic grade grouping.
Montironi R; Santoni M; Mazzucchelli R; Burattini L; Berardi R; Galosi AB; Cheng L; Lopez-Beltran A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Scarpelli M
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2016; 16(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 27008205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies.
Billis A; Guimaraes MS; Freitas LL; Meirelles L; Magna LA; Ferreira U
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate Cancer Grading: A Decade After the 2005 Modified Gleason Grading System.
Kryvenko ON; Epstein JI
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Oct; 140(10):1140-52. PubMed ID: 26756649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact on the clinical outcome of prostate cancer by the 2005 international society of urological pathology modified Gleason grading system.
Dong F; Wang C; Farris AB; Wu S; Lee H; Olumi AF; McDougal WS; Young RH; Wu CL
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):838-43. PubMed ID: 22592143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
