These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26792032)
1. Screening for Colorectal Cancer Using a Multitarget Stool DNA Test: Modeling the Effect of the Intertest Interval on Clinical Effectiveness. Berger BM; Schroy PC; Dinh TA Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2016 Sep; 15(3):e65-74. PubMed ID: 26792032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia. Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A Gastroenterology; 2016 Sep; 151(3):427-439.e6. PubMed ID: 27311556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of the effectiveness of two noninvasive fecal tests used to screen for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults. Sharma T Public Health; 2020 May; 182():70-76. PubMed ID: 32179290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-Effectiveness of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing vs Colonoscopy or Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Alaska Native People. Redwood DG; Dinh TA; Kisiel JB; Borah BJ; Moriarty JP; Provost EM; Sacco FD; Tiesinga JJ; Ahlquist DA Mayo Clin Proc; 2021 May; 96(5):1203-1217. PubMed ID: 33840520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. USPSTF colorectal cancer screening guidelines: an extended look at multi-year interval testing. Berger BM; Parton MA; Levin B Am J Manag Care; 2016 Feb; 22(2):e77-81. PubMed ID: 26881323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The cost-effectiveness of non-invasive stool-based colorectal cancer screening offerings from age 45 for a commercial and medicare population. Ebner D; Kisiel J; Barnieh L; Sharma R; Smith NJ; Estes C; Vahdat V; Ozbay AB; Limburg P; Fendrick AM J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):1219-1226. PubMed ID: 37752872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel multitarget stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening. Malik P Postgrad Med; 2016; 128(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 26753807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multitarget stool DNA tests increases colorectal cancer screening among previously noncompliant Medicare patients. Prince M; Lester L; Chiniwala R; Berger B World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jan; 23(3):464-471. PubMed ID: 28210082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Patient Adherence to Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening and Colonoscopy Following a Positive Test on Clinical Outcomes. Fendrick AM; Fisher DA; Saoud L; Ozbay AB; Karlitz JJ; Limburg PJ Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2021 Sep; 14(9):845-850. PubMed ID: 34021023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating the impact of differential adherence on the comparative effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer screening using the CRC-AIM microsimulation model. Piscitello A; Saoud L; Fendrick AM; Borah BJ; Hassmiller Lich K; Matney M; Ozbay AB; Parton M; Limburg PJ PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244431. PubMed ID: 33373409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PPV and Detection Rate of mt-sDNA Testing, FIT, and CT Colonography for Advanced Neoplasia: A Hierarchic Bayesian Meta-Analysis of the Noninvasive Colorectal Screening Tests. Pickhardt PJ; Correale L; Hassan C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Oct; 217(4):817-830. PubMed ID: 33703913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Early Adoption of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Finney Rutten LJ; Jacobson RM; Wilson PM; Jacobson DJ; Fan C; Kisiel JB; Sweetser S; Tulledge-Scheitel SM; St Sauver JL Mayo Clin Proc; 2017 May; 92(5):726-733. PubMed ID: 28473037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals With Positive Multitarget Stool DNA Tests: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Anderson JC; Robinson CM; Hisey WM; Edwards DK; Kneedler BL; Berger BM; Butterly LF J Clin Gastroenterol; 2022 May-Jun 01; 56(5):419-425. PubMed ID: 33973962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Projecting total costs and health consequences of increasing mt-sDNA utilization for colorectal cancer screening from the payer and integrated delivery network perspectives. Hathway JM; Miller-Wilson LA; Jensen IS; Ozbay B; Regan C; Jena AB; Weinstein MC; Parks PD J Med Econ; 2020 Jun; 23(6):581-592. PubMed ID: 32063100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Alaska Native Patient and Provider Perspectives on the Multitarget Stool DNA Test Compared With Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Redwood DG; Blake ID; Provost EM; Kisiel JB; Sacco FD; Ahlquist DA J Prim Care Community Health; 2019; 10():2150132719884295. PubMed ID: 31646933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Healthcare costs, resource utilization, and productivity loss associated with colorectal cancer screening. Engel-Nitz NM; Miller-Wilson LA; Le L; Fisher DA Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2023; 23(7):843-852. PubMed ID: 37462667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer. Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic Performance of Multitarget Stool DNA and CT Colonography for Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening. Pickhardt PJ; Graffy PM; Weigman B; Deiss-Yehiely N; Hassan C; Weiss JM Radiology; 2020 Oct; 297(1):120-129. PubMed ID: 32779997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimated impact and value of blood-based colorectal cancer screening at varied adherence compared with stool-based screening. Kisiel JB; Fendrick AM; Ebner DW; Ozbay AB; Vahdat V; Estes C; Limburg PJ J Med Econ; 2024; 27(1):746-753. PubMed ID: 38686394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]