These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26792583)

  • 1. Optotype recognition under degradation: comparison of size, contrast, blur, noise and contour-perturbation effects.
    Westheimer G
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Jan; 99(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 26792583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of optical defocus on detection and recognition of vanishing optotype letters in the fovea and periphery.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7063-70. PubMed ID: 22969070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.
    Ridder WH
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 139(3):207-219. PubMed ID: 31414313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring visual form discrimination with blur thresholds.
    Westheimer G
    J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 23599417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can perceptual learning compensate for optical image blur?
    Westheimer G
    Vision Res; 2014 Jan; 94():58-61. PubMed ID: 24269838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contour interaction for high and low contrast optotypes in normal and amblyopic observers.
    Simmers AJ; Gray LS; McGraw PV; Winn B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 May; 19(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 10627844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test-retest variability and correlations between tests of texture processing, motion processing, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity.
    Simpson TL; Regan D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Jan; 72(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 7731649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optical defocus: differential effects on size and contrast letter recognition thresholds.
    Rabin J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Feb; 35(2):646-8. PubMed ID: 8113015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Crowding and visual acuity measured in adults using paediatric test letters, pictures and symbols.
    Lalor SJH; Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ
    Vision Res; 2016 Apr; 121():31-38. PubMed ID: 26878696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual Letter Contrast Thresholds: Effect of Object Frequency and Noise.
    Hall C; Wang S; McAnany JJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1125-32. PubMed ID: 26540471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using visual noise to characterize amblyopic letter identification.
    Pelli DG; Levi DM; Chung ST
    J Vis; 2004 Oct; 4(10):904-20. PubMed ID: 15595894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D; Bonette L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Oct; 10(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 2263364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognition thresholds for letters with simulated dioptric blur.
    Akutsu H; Bedell HE; Patel SS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Oct; 77(10):524-30. PubMed ID: 11100890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation-based evaluation of visual performance to reduce the statistical error of visual acuity.
    Fülep C; Kovács I; Kránitz K; Erdei G
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2017 Jul; 34(7):1255-1264. PubMed ID: 29036136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of optotypes with the Landolt ring--a fresh look at the comparability of optotypes.
    Grimm W; Rassow B; Wesemann W; Saur K; Hilz R
    Optom Vis Sci; 1994 Jan; 71(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8146001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resolution acuity versus recognition acuity with Landolt-style optotypes.
    Heinrich SP; Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Sep; 251(9):2235-41. PubMed ID: 23828648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning to identify contrast-defined letters in peripheral vision.
    Chung ST; Levi DM; Li RW
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):1038-47. PubMed ID: 16337252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effective 3-D shape discrimination survives retinal blur.
    Norman JF; Beers AM; Holmin JS; Boswell AM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1569-75. PubMed ID: 20675801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Correlation of letter optotypes with Landholt ring for different degrees of visual acuity].
    Rassow B; Wang Y
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 Aug; 215(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 10483562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of dioptric blur on reading performance.
    Chung ST; Jarvis SH; Cheung SH
    Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(12):1584-94. PubMed ID: 17442363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.