145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26792756)
1. Reduction of scatter-induced image noise in cone beam computed tomography: effect of field of view size and position.
Pauwels R; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Bosmans H; Panmekiate S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Feb; 121(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 26792756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of Scattered X-Ray Photons in Dental Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Yang CC
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0149904. PubMed ID: 26950435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cone-beam breast computed tomography with a displaced flat panel detector array.
Mettivier G; Russo P; Lanconelli N; Meo SL
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2805-19. PubMed ID: 22559652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Scatter-to-primary ratio in dentomaxillofacial cone-beam CT: effect of field of view and beam energy.
Pauwels R; Pittayapat P; Sinpitaksakul P; Panmekiate S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Dec; 50(8):20200597. PubMed ID: 33882256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
Lofthag-Hansen S
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biplane interventional pediatric system with cone-beam CT: dose and image quality characterization for the default protocols.
Corredoira E; Vañó E; Alejo L; Ubeda C; Gutiérrez-Larraya F; Garayoa J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):357-376. PubMed ID: 27455474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A pragmatic approach to determine the optimal kVp in cone beam CT: balancing contrast-to-noise ratio and radiation dose.
Pauwels R; Silkosessak O; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Bosmans H; Panmekiate S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(5):20140059. PubMed ID: 24708447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimizing effective dose and image quality in cone beam CT sialography.
Douglas DJ; Perschbacher SE; Moayedi M; Lam EWN
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 May; 135(5):686-697. PubMed ID: 36774241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose measurements for dental cone-beam CT: a comparison with MSCT and panoramic imaging.
Deman P; Atwal P; Duzenli C; Thakur Y; Ford NL
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 59(12):3201-22. PubMed ID: 24862349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-to-noise ratio with different large volumes in a cone-beam computerized tomography machine: an in vitro study.
Bechara B; McMahan CA; Moore WS; Noujeim M; Geha H
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Nov; 114(5):658-65. PubMed ID: 23083479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetry in CBCT with Different Protocols: Emphasis on Small FOVs Including Exams for TMJ.
Nascimento HAR; Andrade MEA; Frazão MAG; Nascimento EHL; Ramos-Perez FMM; Freitas DQ
Braz Dent J; 2017; 28(4):511-516. PubMed ID: 29160405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: effect of field of view and angle of rotation.
Pauwels R; Zhang G; Theodorakou C; Walker A; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K;
Br J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 87(1042):20130654. PubMed ID: 25189417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image quality optimization using a narrow vertical detector dental cone-beam CT.
Brasil DM; Pauwels R; Coucke W; Haiter-Neto F; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Mar; 48(3):20180357. PubMed ID: 30604636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and validation of a hybrid simulation technique for cone beam CT: application to an oral imaging system.
Zhang G; Pauwels R; Marshall N; Shaheen E; Nuyts J; Jacobs R; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(18):5823-43. PubMed ID: 21846936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scatter kernel estimation with an edge-spread function method for cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
Li H; Mohan R; Zhu XR
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6729-48. PubMed ID: 18997269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of subjective image quality in relation to diagnostic task for cone beam computed tomography with different fields of view.
Lofthag-Hansen S; Thilander-Klang A; Gröndahl K
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):483-8. PubMed ID: 20965675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm imaging system.
Zhang J; Weir V; Fajardo L; Lin J; Hsiung H; Ritenour ER
J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 19923687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a metal artefact reduction tool on different positions of a metal object in the FOV.
Queiroz PM; Santaella GM; da Paz TD; Freitas DQ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Mar; 46(3):20160366. PubMed ID: 27910700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of gray values in CBCT and MSCT images for determination of density: influence of variation of FOV size.
Rodrigues AF; Campos MJ; Chaoubah A; Fraga MR; Farinazzo Vitral RW
Implant Dent; 2015 Apr; 24(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 25706259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
