These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26793815)

  • 1. Physically Intrusive Abortion Restrictions as Fourth Amendment Searches and Seizures: A new conceptual avenue for challenging abortion restrictions.
    Harv Law Rev; 2015 Jan; 128(3):951-72. PubMed ID: 26793815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
    Ezzard MM
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Freedom at home: state constitutions and Medicaid funding for abortions.
    Vanzi LM
    N M Law Rev; 1996; 26(3):433-54. PubMed ID: 16100794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
    O'Shaughnessy M
    Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Privacy rights and abortion outing: a proposal for using common-law torts to protect abortion patients and staff.
    Clapman A
    Yale Law J; 2003 Apr; 112(6):1545-76. PubMed ID: 15046034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lesbians and abortion.
    Robson R
    Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):247-79. PubMed ID: 21774157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization.
    Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informed consent and the First Amendment.
    Mariner WK; Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Apr; 372(14):1285-7. PubMed ID: 25830420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The law of the sacred cow: sacrificing the First Amendment to defend abortion on demand.
    Lugosi C
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 2001; 79(1):91-135. PubMed ID: 12769120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The validity of legislative restrictions on abortion under the Oregon constitution.
    Tweedt DE
    Temple Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):1349-71. PubMed ID: 16047444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment.
    Shapiro AA
    Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Informed consent laws and the constitution: balancing state interests with a physician's first amendment rights and a woman's due process rights.
    Runels S
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2009; 26(1):185-211. PubMed ID: 20112623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
    Weissmann R
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do fetal rights limit mothers' rights?
    State Legis; 2002 Jun; 28(6):6. PubMed ID: 12051253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. State Restrictions on Mifepristone Access - The Case for Federal Preemption.
    Zettler PJ; Sarpatwari A
    N Engl J Med; 2022 Feb; 386(8):705-707. PubMed ID: 35020981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bioethics discovers the Bill of Rights.
    Veatch RM
    Natl Forum; 1989; 69(4):11-3. PubMed ID: 16100834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: abortion funding restrictions as an unconstitutional condition.
    Sherman CW
    Calif Law Rev; 1982 Jul; 70(4):978-1013. PubMed ID: 11655731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    Rosen JD
    N Engl J Med; 2020 Sep; 383(12):1101-1103. PubMed ID: 32937044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.