285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26794344)
1. Detection and Analysis of Enamel Cracks by Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence Technology.
Jun MK; Ku HM; Kim E; Kim HE; Kwon HK; Kim BI
J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):500-4. PubMed ID: 26794344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study to quantify demineralized enamel in deciduous and permanent teeth using laser- and light-induced fluorescence techniques.
Ando M; van Der Veen MH; Schemehorn BR; Stookey GK
Caries Res; 2001; 35(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 11799288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noninvasive cross-sectional visualization of enamel cracks by optical coherence tomography in vitro.
Imai K; Shimada Y; Sadr A; Sumi Y; Tagami J
J Endod; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1269-74. PubMed ID: 22892749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-Dimensional Analysis of Enamel Crack Behavior Using Optical Coherence Tomography.
Segarra MS; Shimada Y; Sadr A; Sumi Y; Tagami J
J Dent Res; 2017 Mar; 96(3):308-314. PubMed ID: 27872333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of fluorescence parameters between three generations of QLF devices for detecting enamel caries in vitro and on smooth surfaces.
Park SW; Kim SK; Lee HS; Lee ES; de Josselin de Jong E; Kim BI
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2019 Mar; 25():142-147. PubMed ID: 30508664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital (QLF-D) for the detection of approximal caries in vitro.
Ko HY; Kang SM; Kim HE; Kwon HK; Kim BI
J Dent; 2015 May; 43(5):568-75. PubMed ID: 25724115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of tooth wear based on autofluorescence properties measured using the QLF technology in vitro.
Lee HS; Lee YD; Kim SK; Choi JH; Kim BI
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2019 Mar; 25():265-270. PubMed ID: 30611863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of tooth wear by estimating enamel thickness with quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology.
Kim SK; Park SW; Lee HS; Lee ES; de Josselin de Jong E; Kim BI
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2019 Mar; 25():319-324. PubMed ID: 30648640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of Dental Caries and Cracks with Quantitative Light-Induced Fluorescence in Comparison to Radiographic and Visual Examination: A Retrospective Case Study.
Oh SH; Lee SR; Choi JY; Choi YS; Kim SH; Yoon HC; Nelson G
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Mar; 21(5):. PubMed ID: 33802443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing caries removal by undergraduate dental students using quantitative light-induced fluorescence.
Adeyemi AA; Jarad FD; Komarov GN; Pender N; Higham SM
J Dent Educ; 2008 Nov; 72(11):1318-23. PubMed ID: 18981210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Associations of types of pain with crack-level, tooth-level and patient-level characteristics in posterior teeth with visible cracks: Findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
Hilton TJ; Funkhouser E; Ferracane JL; Gordan VV; Huff KD; Barna J; Mungia R; Marker T; Gilbert GH;
J Dent; 2018 Mar; 70():67-73. PubMed ID: 29289728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Fluorescence Imaging with Reflectance Enhancement (FIRE) for Quantifying Enamel Demineralization In vitro.
Xiao Q; Tu R; He T; Yin W; Li X; Hu D; Zhang X
Caries Res; 2015; 49(5):531-9. PubMed ID: 26315970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of surface defects in early caries assessment using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) and micro-digital-photography (MDP).
Meharry MR; Dawson D; Wefel JS; Harless JD; Kummet CM; Xiao X
J Dent; 2012 Nov; 40(11):955-61. PubMed ID: 22892465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology for quantitative evaluation of tooth wear.
Kim SK; Lee HS; Park SW; Lee ES; de Josselin de Jong E; Jung HI; Kim BI
J Biomed Opt; 2017 Oct; 22(12):1-6. PubMed ID: 29043715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effectiveness of a Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescent Device for the Diagnosis of a Cracked Tooth: A Case Report.
Son SA; Kim JH; Park JK
J Endod; 2021 Nov; 47(11):1796-1800. PubMed ID: 34437880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology in diagnosing cracked teeth.
Lee JI; Jeon MJ; de Jong EJ; Jung HI; Jung IY; Park JW; Shin SJ
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Mar; 41():103299. PubMed ID: 36693456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monitoring enamel caries on resin-treated occlusal surfaces using quantitative light-induced fluorescence: an in vitro study.
Silva FG; Freitas PM; Mendes FM; de Novaes TF; Diniz MB; Oliveira Guaré R
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Sep; 35(7):1629-1636. PubMed ID: 32382936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro Detection of Occlusal Caries on Permanent Teeth by a Visual, Light-Induced Fluorescence and Photothermal Radiometry and Modulated Luminescence Methods.
Jallad M; Zero D; Eckert G; Ferreira Zandona A
Caries Res; 2015; 49(5):523-30. PubMed ID: 26316073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Definitive diagnosis of early enamel and dentin cracks based on microscopic evaluation.
Clark DJ; Sheets CG; Paquette JM
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2003; 15(7):391-401; discussion 401. PubMed ID: 15000906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection and analysis of enamel cracks by ICG-NIR fluorescence dental imaging.
Li Z; Holamoge YV; Li Z; Zaid W; Osborn ML; Ramos A; Miller JT; Li Y; Yao S; Xu J
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2020 Sep; 1475(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 32519363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
