These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26794913)
1. Semi-Nonparametric Methods for Detecting Latent Non-normality: A Fusion of Latent Trait and Ordered Latent Class Modeling. Schmitt JE; Mehta PD; Aggen SH; Kubarych TS; Neale MC Multivariate Behav Res; 2006 Dec; 41(4):427-43. PubMed ID: 26794913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of latent and error non-normality on corrections to the test statistic in structural equation modeling. Jobst LJ; Auerswald M; Moshagen M Behav Res Methods; 2022 Oct; 54(5):2351-2363. PubMed ID: 35014004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Summed Score Likelihood-Based Indices for Testing Latent Variable Distribution Fit in Item Response Theory. Li Z; Cai L Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Oct; 78(5):857-886. PubMed ID: 32655173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effect of Latent and Error Non-Normality on Measures of Fit in Structural Equation Modeling. Jobst LJ; Auerswald M; Moshagen M Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Oct; 82(5):911-937. PubMed ID: 35989731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Power and Type I Error of the Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis Model for Detecting Differential Item Functioning in Graded Response Items. Gonzalez-Roma V; Hernandez A; Gomez-Benito J Multivariate Behav Res; 2006 Mar; 41(1):29-53. PubMed ID: 26788893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeling continuous diagnostic test data using approximate Dirichlet process distributions. Ladouceur M; Rahme E; Bélisle P; Scott AN; Schwartzman K; Joseph L Stat Med; 2011 Sep; 30(21):2648-62. PubMed ID: 21786286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Unidimensional Latent Trait Model for Continuous Item Responses. Mellenbergh GJ Multivariate Behav Res; 1994 Jul; 29(3):223-36. PubMed ID: 26765136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Impact of Non-Normality on Extraction of Spurious Latent Classes in Mixture IRT Models. Sen S; Cohen AS; Kim SH Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Mar; 40(2):98-113. PubMed ID: 29881041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementing continuous non-normal skewed distributions in latent growth mixture modeling: An assessment of specification errors and class enumeration. Depaoli S; Winter SD; Lai K; Guerra-Peña K Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(6):795-821. PubMed ID: 31012738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. IRT Modeling in the Presence of Zero-Inflation With Application to Psychiatric Disorder Severity. Wall MM; Park JY; Moustaki I Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Nov; 39(8):583-597. PubMed ID: 29881029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exponential distribution of total depressive symptom scores in relation to exponential latent trait and item threshold distributions: a simulation study. Tomitaka S; Kawasaki Y; Ide K; Akutagawa M; Yamada H; Furukawa TA BMC Res Notes; 2017 Nov; 10(1):614. PubMed ID: 29169379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Normal Versus Noncentral Chi-square Asymptotics of Misspecified Models. Chun SY; Shapiro A Multivariate Behav Res; 2009 Nov; 44(6):803-27. PubMed ID: 26801797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Asymptotic Posterior Normality of Multivariate Latent Traits in an IRT Model. Kornely MJK; Kateri M Psychometrika; 2022 Sep; 87(3):1146-1172. PubMed ID: 35149979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distinguishing Between Latent Classes and Continuous Factors: Resolution by Maximum Likelihood? Lubke G; Neale MC Multivariate Behav Res; 2006 Dec; 41(4):499-532. PubMed ID: 26794916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Goodness-of-Fit Testing for Latent Class Models. Collins LM; Fidler PL; Wugalter SE; Long JD Multivariate Behav Res; 1993 Jul; 28(3):375-89. PubMed ID: 26776893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Power and sample size determination in the Rasch model: evaluation of the robustness of a numerical method to non-normality of the latent trait. Guilleux A; Blanchin M; Hardouin JB; Sébille V PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e83652. PubMed ID: 24427276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Monte Carlo study comparing PIV, ULS and DWLS in the estimation of dichotomous confirmatory factor analysis. Nestler S Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):127-43. PubMed ID: 22524532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Heteroscedastic Graded Response Model with a Skewed Latent Trait: Testing Statistical and Substantive Hypotheses Related to Skewed Item Category Functions. Molenaar D; Dolan CV; de Boeck P Psychometrika; 2012 Jul; 77(3):455-78. PubMed ID: 27519776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing DIF among small samples with separate calibration t and Mantel-Haenszel χ² statistics in the Rasch model. Bernstein I; Samuels E; Woo A; Hagge SL J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 24064579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the relevance of assumptions associated with classical factor analytic approaches. Kasper D; Unlü A Front Psychol; 2013; 4():109. PubMed ID: 23543634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]