BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26795295)

  • 1. Associations with Intraocular Pressure in a Large Cohort: Results from the UK Biobank.
    Chan MP; Grossi CM; Khawaja AP; Yip JL; Khaw KT; Patel PJ; Khaw PT; Morgan JE; Vernon SA; Foster PJ;
    Ophthalmology; 2016 Apr; 123(4):771-82. PubMed ID: 26795295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corneal-compensated intraocular pressure, Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure and their associated factors in the geriatric population, a population-based study.
    Shokrollahzadeh F; Hashemi H; Yekta A; Ostadimoghaddam H; Jafarzadehpour E; Khabazkhoob M
    Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Jul; 42(7):2085-2092. PubMed ID: 34981293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma.
    Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Hagishima M; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 248(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 19693527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age-related change in corneal biomechanical parameters in a healthy Caucasian population.
    Celebi ARC; Kilavuzoglu AE; Altiparmak UE; Cosar Yurteri CB
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 25(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 28891725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
    Shen Y; Su X; Liu X; Miao H; Fang X; Zhou X
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 27863469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Reichert 7 Noncontact Tonometry.
    Güngör SG; Akman A; Yazici AC
    J Glaucoma; 2015 Aug; 24(6):438-41. PubMed ID: 24145288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of corneal geometrical and biomechanical properties on tonometry readings in keratoconic eyes.
    Bilgeç MD; Atalay E; Sözer Ö; Gürsoy H; Bilgin M; Yıldırım N
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 31792851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after corneal refractive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhang H; Sun Z; Li L; Sun R; Zhang H
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):23. PubMed ID: 31924174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
    Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of ocular pulse amplitude on ocular response analyzer measurements.
    Xu G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Aug; 20(6):344-9. PubMed ID: 20852442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics in an adult British population: the EPIC-Norfolk eye study.
    Foster PJ; Broadway DC; Garway-Heath DF; Yip JL; Luben R; Hayat S; Dalzell N; Wareham NJ; Khaw KT
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Oct; 52(11):8179-85. PubMed ID: 21931129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of Valsalva manoeuvre on Ocular Response Analyzer measurements.
    Palamar M; Dag MY; Yagci A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Sep; 98(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 26390907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
    Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Associations with Corneal Hysteresis in a Population Cohort: Results from 96 010 UK Biobank Participants.
    Zhang B; Shweikh Y; Khawaja AP; Gallacher J; Bauermeister S; Foster PJ;
    Ophthalmology; 2019 Nov; 126(11):1500-1510. PubMed ID: 31471087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Trabeculectomy and the Impact on Intraocular Pressure Measurement.
    Pillunat KR; Spoerl E; Terai N; Pillunat LE
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):278-282. PubMed ID: 27977478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of topical corneal anaesthesia on ocular response analyzer parameters: pilot study.
    Ehongo A; De Maertelaer V; Pourjavan S
    Int Ophthalmol; 2009 Oct; 29(5):325-8. PubMed ID: 18545939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraocular pressure changes and corneal biomechanics after hyperopic small-incision lenticule extraction.
    Fu D; Li M; Knorz MC; Wei S; Shang J; Zhou X
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):129. PubMed ID: 32248796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
    Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Refinement of Intraocular Pressure Measurements made by Ocular Response Analyzer following Laser in Situ Keratomileusis using M2 90 Moria Microkeratome for Egyptian Myopic and Astigmatic Patients.
    Refai TA; Hassanin OA
    Electron Physician; 2016 Dec; 8(12):3429-3433. PubMed ID: 28163860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraocular pressure and biomechanical corneal properties measure by ocular response analyser in patients with primary congenital glaucoma.
    Perucho-González L; Martínez de la Casa JM; Morales-Fernández L; Bañeros-Rojas P; Saenz-Francés F; García-Feijoó J
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e293-7. PubMed ID: 26647905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.